Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 22;49:92. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0370-x

Table 2.

Comparison of models used to estimate genomic inbreeding coefficients with different numbers of HBD classes (from 1 to 4)

Panel density Na Number of fitted HBD classes Mean FG Correlation with FbG-8192 Median of estimated R k rates per HBD class
1st HBD class 2nd HBD class 3rd HBD class 4th HBD class
LD 634 1 0.058 0.982 15
LD 0 2 0.061 0.998 11 106
LD 0 3 0.061 0.999 11 104 162
LD 0 4 0.061 0.999 10 42 150 175
50 K 289 1 0.083 0.983 41
50 K 345 2 0.094 0.999 15 198
50 K 0 3 0.094 1.000 14 173 238
50 K 0 4 0.094 1.000 11 64 240 243
HD 0 1 0.297 0.999 1214
HD 0 2 0.302 1.000 60 1679
HD 629 3 0.303 1.000 22 392 1887
HD 5 4 0.303 1.000 19 342 1823 1914
WGS 0 1 0.354 1.000 3740
WGS 0 2 0.359 1.000 577 8158
WGS 27 3 0.359 1.000 55 1009 8192
WGS 23 4 0.359 1.000 21 206 1104 8192

The R k rates of each HBD class were estimated for each individual and for each SNP density (LD, 50 K, HD panels or whole-genome sequence data). The table reports which models are selected as best based on the BIC criterion, the average FG and its correlation with a reference FG obtained with a model using 13 HBD classes

aN = number of individuals with the corresponding model selected as best based on the BIC

bThe reference inbreeding coefficient FG-8192 is obtained with a Mix14R model and the same SNP density