Table 2.

Summary of results in children with ADHD compared to TDC.

ADHD–TDC
Stim.	Regions	Measure	Comp./Freq.	Time (ms)	Electrodes	Sig. 1
Cue	Posterior Figure 3	ERP	↓P1-N2	115–205	Oz, O1, O2	p < 0.009
			↑N2	170–191	Pz, P3	p < 0.045
		ERSP	↓β (27–32)	238–485	Oz, O1, O2, P4	p < 0.044
			↓γ (40–43)	332–427	Oz, O2, O1	p < 0.049
		ITC	↓θ (4–8)	261–425	Oz, O1, O2, Pz, P3, P4	p < 0.039
			↑β (25–30)	273–422	Oz, O1, P4, P3	p < 0.044
	Anterior	ERP	↓N1	121–161	Fz, F3, F4, Fpz	p < 0.018
			↑P2	223–273	Fz, F3, F4, Fpz	p < 0.019
		ERSP	↓α (9–12)	150–312	Fz, F3, F4	p < 0.035
		ITC	↓α (10–13)	101–263	Fz, F4	p < 0.049
Go	Posterior	ERP	↓P1-N2	146–189	Oz, O1, O2, Pz, P3	p < 0.022
			↓P3	345–439	Oz, O1, O2, Pz, P3	p < 0.044
		ERSP	↓θ (4–7)	302–390	Oz, O1, O2, P3, P4	p < 0.034
			↓γ (42–47)	570–679	Oz, O1, O2, P3, P4	p < 0.032
		ITC	↓θ-α (5–12)	320–453	Oz, O1, O2, Pz, P3	p < 0.041
	Central Figure 4	ERP	↓P3	464–656	Cz, C3	p < 0.012
		ERSP	↑α (7–13)	252–541	Cz, C3, C4	p < 0.031
			↓γ (42–47)	566–593	Cz, C4	p < 0.032
		ITC	↓α (8–14)	220–347	Cz, C3, C4	p < 0.018
	Anterior	ERP	↓N1	117–128	Fz, F3, F4	p < 0.044
			↑P2	207–260	Fz, F3, F4	p < 0.011
		ERSP	↓α (10–18)	109–234	Fz, F3, F4	p < 0.003
			↓γ (38–47)	517–654	Fz, F4	p < 0.032
Nogo	Posterior	ERP	↓P1, ↑N2	136–209	Oz, O1, O2, Pz, P3	p < 0.005
		ERSP	↑α (12–16)	126–273	Oz, O1, O2, Pz, P3, P4	p < 0.003
			↓γ (31–36)	296–380	Oz, O1, O2, Pz, P3, P4	p < 0.018
		ITC	↓θ-α (5–14)	308–414	Oz, O1, O2, P3	p < 0.005
			↑γ (31–36)	302–410	Oz, O2, Pz, P3, P4	p < 0.007
	Central	ERSP	↓θ (4–8)	255–423	Cz, C3	p < 0.002
			↓γ (38–43)	428–509	Cz, C3, C4	p < 0.048
		ITC	↓θ (4–8)	291–369	Cz, C3	p < 0.016
			↑γ (31–37)	275–345	Cz, C3, C4	p < 0.041
	Anterior Figure 5	ERP	↓N1-P2	136–211	F3, F4	p < 0.049
			↓N3	279–344	Fz, F3, F4, Fpz	p < 0.018
		ERSP	↓θ-α (4–11)	277–396	Fz, F3, F4	p < 0.014
			↓γ (38–45)	316–517	Fz, F3, F4, Fpz	p < 0.022
		ITC	↓θ-α (5–11)	256–390	Fz, F3	p < 0.016
			↑γ (34–44)	382–511	Fz, F3, F4	p < 0.003

Note: Arrows indicated increase or decrease of ERP amplitude or ERSP/ITC in children with ADHD compared to TDC. ¹ p-values below are corrected for multiples comparisons (False Discovery Rate method). ERP: Evoked-Related Potentials; ERSP: Evoked-Related Spectral Perturbation; ITC: Inter-trials Coherence.