Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 21;14:31–37. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S145681

Table 3.

The comparison of clinical data in each group after treatment

L and Con groups (n =120)
M group (n=53)
S group (n=67)
L group
Con group
p-value M1 group
M2 group
p-value S1 group
S2 group
p-value
(n=60) (n=60) (n=29) (n=24) (n=32) (n=35)
Antibiotic usage (days) 11.121±0.772 13.227±0.605 0.124 11.48±3.55 10.42±2.569 0.225 12.94±3.340 14.66±3.386 0.041
Ventilator time (h) 145.95±21.46 152.01±35.78 0.515 5.79±4.15 6.13±4.28 0.956 126.09±12.91 169.36±16.45 0.043
Survival time (days) 27.77±0.127 24.15±1.029 0.027 28.00±0.00 27.17±4.082 0.276 27.56±1.243 21.69±9.048 0.001
Clinical efficacy (%) 88.33 86.67 0.044 96.55 96.55 0.448 78.13 57.14 0.007
BE (%) 98.33 75.00 0.000 100.00 83.33 0.011 96.88 71.43 0.005
28-day mortality (%) 1.67 8.33 0.023 0.00 0.00 1.000 3.12 14.29 0.027

Notes: The Con group (conventional treatment group) received traditional infusion of TZP and the L group (improved administration group) received it as prolonged infusion. Blood drug concentration was detected at different time points. Based on the SOFA cut-off value of 9, the patients were regrouped into M (mild) and S (severe) groups. M1: mild group with prolonged administration; M2: mild group with traditional administration; S1: severe group with prolonged administration; S2: severe group with traditional administration.

Abbreviation: BE, bacteriologic efficacy.