Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 21;11:47–57. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S151390

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of vascular invasion, tumor encapsulation, and TNM by methods or sample

Subgroups No of studies No of patients Pooled OR (95% CI) PHet I2 (%) p-value
Vascular invasion
Methods
 RT-PCR 4 344 0.90 (0.23–3.64) 0.040 76.0 0.888
 IHC 4 439 1.95 (1.30–2.92) 0.024 35.9 0.013
Sample size
  ≤100 5 412 1.81 (1.26–2.62) 0.126 44.3 0.024
 >100 3 371 1.20 (0.25–5.76) 0.001 85.9 0.819
Tumor encapsulation
Methods
 RT-PCR 5 344 1.64 (0.63–4.24) 0.029 68.8 0.311
 IHC 3 379 0.58 (0.37–0.90) 0.348 5.0 0.015
Sample size
  ≤100 4 471 0.94 (0.52–1.69) 0.002 79.9 0.640
 >100 4 252 0.70 (0.46–1.05) 0.741 0 0.086
TNM stage
Methods
 RT-PCR 4 344 0.55 (0.22–1.38) 0.031 66.1 0.201
 IHC 4 403 0.53 (0.22–1.27) 0.021 69.3 0.155
Sample size
  ≤100 5 276 2.91 (0.26–1.89) 0.013 68.4 0.458
 >100 3 471 0.40 (0.20–0.81) 0.064 63.7 0.011

Abbreviations: IHC, immunohistochemistry; OR, odds ratio; RT-PCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; PHet, probability of heterogeneity.