. 2017 Oct-Dec;21(4):e2017.00061. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00061

Table 3.

Most Recent Match-Pair Analyses of Laparoscopic Versus OLRs for HCC and CRC Mets

Cancer	Study	n	Surgery	Cirrhosis (%)	P	Conversion Rate (%)	Blood Loss (mL)	P	R0 resection (%)		Hospital Stay (days)	P	5-y Survival
HCC	Han et al³	88	LLR	62.5	NS	9.1	500	NS	98.9	NS	8	=0.001	76.4 mo	NS
		88	OLR	59.1	NS		525	NS	94.3	NS	10	=0.001	73.2 mo	NS
	Kim et al¹²	29	LLR	100	NS	23	485	NS	89.7	NS	7.7	<0.001	47.9 mo	NS
		29	OLR	100	NS		262	NS	96.6	NS	13.4	<0.001	59.5 mo	NS
	Cheung et al¹³	32	LLR	87.5	NS	—	150	=0.001	97	NS	4	<0.001	76.6	NS
		64	OLR	79.7	NS		300	=0.001	94	NS	7	<0.001	57	NS
	Truant et al¹⁴	36	LLR	100¹		19.4	452	NS	—		6.5	=0.003	70	NS
		53	OLR	100¹			447	NS	—		9.5	=0.003	46	NS
	Hu et al¹⁵	30	LLR	83		0	520	NS	—		13	<0.01	53.3	NS
		30	OLR	—			480	NS	—		20	<0.01	50	NS
	Lee et al¹⁶	33	LLR	84.8	=0.038	18.2	150	NS	97	NS	5	<0.001	76	NS
		50	OLR	64	=0.038		240	NS	98	NS	7	<0.001	76,1	NS
CRC metastases	Tohme et al⁴	66	LLR			4	150	NS	88	NS	4	<0.001	51.3	NS
		66	OLR				250	NS	89	NS	5	<0.001	38.6	NS
	Guerron et al¹⁷	40	LLR			5	376	=0.04	1 cm	NS	3.7	<0.001	89²	NS
		40	OLR				753	=0.04	1 cm	NS	6.5	<0.001	81²	NS
	Qiu et al¹⁸	30	LLR	6.7	NS	6.7	215	<0.001	9.9 cm	NS	7.5	<0.001	—
		30	OLR	10	NS		385	<0.001	1 cm	NS	11.5	<0.001	—
	Cannon et al¹⁹	35	LLR			—	202	<0.001	97	p=0.02	4.8	<0.001	36	NS
		138	OLR				392	<0.001	81	p=0.02	7.8	<0.001	37	NS
	Cheung et al²⁰	20	LLR			0	200	=0.043	0.6 cm	NS	4.5	=0.021	69.4 mo	NS
		40	OLR				300	=0.043	0.5 cm	NS	7	=0.021	42.1 mo
	Schiffman et al²¹	242	LLR			—	262	=0.049	94.5	NS	6.5	=0.007	51.4	NS
		386	OLR				385	=0.049	87.4	NS	8.8	=0.007	45.9
	Fretland et al²³	133	LLR			2	300	NS	94	NS	53h	<0.001	—
		147	OLR				200	NS	93	NS	96h	<0.001	—

All F3 and F4 fibrosis;

2-year survival; ³references 14–17 included in this meta-analysis. [-] information not provided; mo, months; NS, not significant.