Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 15;7(24):11033–11043. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3527

Table 1.

Dominant tree species and soil nutrient concentrations at depths of 0–30 cm in the four forests investigated

Forest type Dominant species Importance value (%) Average tree height (m) Soil depth (cm) Organic C (g/kg) Total N (g/kg) Total P (g/kg)
CL C. lanceolata 100.00 19.5 0–15 19.72 ± 4.27b,c 1.12 ± 0.23c,d,e 0.21 ± 0.06b
15–30 14.99 ± 3.36c 0.96 ± 0.22e 0.20 ± 0.07b
PM P. massoniana 28.24 13.5 0–15 24.21 ± 7.49a,b 1.37 ± 0.29b,c 0.25 ± 0.06a,b
L. glaber 20.04 8.0 15–30 17.75 ± 4.19c 1.02 ± 0.22e 0.22 ± 0.05b,c
CA C. axillaris 26.49 15.9 0–15 23.63 ± 6.97a,b 1.65 ± 0.44a 0.29 ± 0.07a
Loropetalum chinensis 15.51 4.8 15–30 18.40 ± 4.62c 1.33 ± 0.44c,d 0.27 ± 0.06a
CG C. glauca 9.90 11.4 0–15 25.79 ± 7.34a 1.44 ± 0.36a,b 0.20 ± 0.04c
L. glaber 25.93 10.5 15–30 18.48 ± 6.71c 1.12 ± 0.37c,d,e 0.19 ± 0.04c

CL, Cunninghamia lanceolata forest; PM, Pinus massoniana forest; CA, Choerospondias axillaris forest; CG, Cyclobalanopsis glauca; LG, Lithocarpus glaber forest.

In each column, values from the same sample type with different letters indicate significant differences at p < .05.