Table 3.
Analysis of model deviance with increasing polynomial degrees for single infection treatments using P. ramosa clones and isolates
| Degrees | Single infection treatments | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parasite clone C1 | Parasite clone C14 | Parasite isolate P1 | Parasite isolate P2 | Parasite isolate P4 | |||||||||||
| df | Deviance | p | df | Deviance | p | df | Deviance | p | df | Deviance | p | df | Deviance | p | |
| 2 versus 1 | 96 | 7.84 | .005 | 98 | 6.00 | .037 | 96 | 8.16 | .003 | 62 | 10.06 | .0008 | 100 | 22.27 | <.0001 |
| 3 versus 2 | 95 | 4.04 | .044 | 97 | 6.35 | .032 | 95 | 2.08 | .128 | 61 | 5.74 | .011 | 99 | 22.38 | <.0001 |
The null model has a first‐degree polynomial term that is highly significant (p < .0001) in all infection treatments. Bold typeface indicates significant effects.