Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 3;11(1):211–223. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12865

Table 2.

Biomass productivity of axenic (AX), laboratory (LAB) and unibacterial cocultures of Tetraselmis suecica F&M‐M33 performed in vitamin‐added and vitamin‐free culture media. The ratio of bacterial concentration at the end compared with the start of the trial is also reported for both culture media. For the same parameter, along the row, the same superscript letter indicates significant difference (P < 0.05). No significant differences for biomass productivity were found along the columns, except for AG2 in vitamin‐free medium. The taxonomic identification of the bacteria indicated here by their codes is reported in Table 3. na = not applicable

Culture Biomass productivity Bacterial number ratio
mg l−1 d−1 End/start
+ Vitamins − Vitamins + Vitamins − Vitamins
AX 79.6 ± 9.0 78.2 ± 6.6 na na
LAB 61.8 ± 5.5 53.0 ± 4.2 13.1 ± 1.9 10.1 ± 3.7
AX + ABG2 51.3 ± 12.5 47.0 ± 12.0 5.0 ± 0.2 3.9 ± 1.2
AX + AG2 52.5 ± 16.0a 18.0 ± 0.6a 1.6 ± 0.5 1.2 ± 1.0
AX + LB4 53.7 ± 20.0 56.7 ± 25.6 3.8 ± 0.4 1.5 ± 0.6
AX + LG3 55.5 ± 8.8 40.0 ± 12.1 3.8 ± 0.6a 0.2 ± 0.1a
AX + AAD3 83.9 ± 8.3 74.4 ± 15.7 8.8 ± 2.9 3.2 ± 1.0
AX + LB1 77.8 ± 22.0 67.1 ± 24.9 5.9 ± 2.4 6.7 ± 2.8
AX + LBG3 67.5 ± 4.6 56.5 ± 11.9 5.1 ± 1.0a 0.9 ± 0.1a
AX + CIar 49.5 ± 8.2 52.7 ± 9.8 4.5 ± 1.7 2.8 ± 2.1