. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 27.

Published in final edited form as: Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Dec 7;47(2):433–442. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.11.037

Table 1.

Assessment of microarrav data quality.

	L_13M	L_14M	L_15M	L_17M	L_22M	L_25M	L_27M	L_28M	L_2M	L_32M	L_34M	L_37M	L_39M	L_3M	L_41M	L_47M	L_48M	L_50M	L_51M	L_54M	L_56M	L_59M	L_5M	L_8M
L_13M_0.125	1.000	0.990	0.989	0.990	0.990	0.990	0.990	0.989	0.990	0.988	0.987	0.988	0.987	0.989	0.985	0.984	0.984	0.985	0.977	0.979	0.980	0.981	0.989	0.987
L_14M_0.125		1.000	0.989	0.991	0.991	0.991	0.991	0.990	0.990	0.989	0.989	0.989	0.988	0.989	0.987	0.986	0.986	0.987	0.980	0.982	0.982	0.984	0.989	0.987
L_15M_0.125			1.000	0.990	0.989	0.990	0.990	0.990	0.989	0.987	0.987	0.989	0.988	0.990	0.985	0.984	0.985	0.986	0.978	0.980	0.980	0.982	0.989	0.987
L_17M_0.125				1.000	0.991	0.991	0.991	0.991	0.991	0.989	0.989	0.989	0.988	0.990	0.986	0.985	0.986	0.987	0.980	0.982	0.981	0.983	0.990	0.989
L_22M_0.25					1.000	0.993	0.992	0.992	0.991	0.989	0.990	0.989	0.989	0.989	0.987	0.987	0.986	0.987	0.981	0.983	0.983	0.985	0.989	0.988
L_25M_0.25						1.000	0.992	0.992	0.991	0.990	0.991	0.991	0.990	0.990	0.988	0.988	0.987	0.987	0.981	0.982	0.983	0.985	0.989	0.988
L_27M_0.25							1.000	0.991	0.991	0.989	0.990	0.989	0.989	0.989	0.987	0.987	0.986	0.988	0.981	0.983	0.983	0.985	0.989	0.988
L_28M_0.25								1.000	0.991	0.989	0.990	0.990	0.989	0.990	0.986	0.986	0.986	0.987	0.980	0.982	0.982	0.984	0.989	0.988
L_2M_0									1.000	0.988	0.988	0.988	0.987	0.990	0.985	0.984	0.985	0.986	0.978	0.980	0.980	0.982	0.990	0.988
L_32M_0.5										1.000	0.993	0.992	0.992	0.987	0.991	0.991	0.991	0.991	0.986	0.987	0.987	0.988	0.987	0.985
L_34M_0.5											1.000	0.992	0.992	0.987	0.991	0.992	0.990	0.991	0.986	0.986	0.986	0.988	0.987	0.986
L_37M_0.5												1.000	0.993	0.988	0.992	0.990	0.991	0.991	0.985	0.987	0.987	0.988	0.987	0.986
L_39M_0.5													1.000	0.986	0.991	0.991	0.991	0.990	0.985	0.986	0.986	0.987	0.987	0.985
L_3M_0														1.000	0.984	0.983	0.983	0.985	0.976	0.978	0.978	0.980	0.988	0.987
L_41M_1															1.000	0.992	0.993	0.992	0.989	0.990	0.990	0.991	0.984	0.983
L_47M_1																1.000	0.992	0.991	0.990	0.990	0.991	0.992	0.983	0.982
L_48M_1																	1.000	0.991	0.990	0.991	0.990	0.990	0.984	0.983
L_50M_1																		1.000	0.988	0.990	0.989	0.990	0.984	0.983
L_51M_2																			1.000	0.993	0.993	0.992	0.977	0.976
L_54M_2																				1.000	0.992	0.993	0.979	0.978
L_56M_2																					1.000	0.993	0.979	0.978
L_59M_2																						1.000	0.981	0.980
L_5M_0																							1.000	0.987
L_8M_0																								1.000

The microarray data reproducibility was assessed by the Pearson’s correlation coefficient of pair-wise log₂ intensity correlation. The median rank of correlation is 0.989 across all 24 arrays with the range of 0.976–0.993. Pearson’s correlation matrix of 24 arrays was calculated based on all data points (22,226 probes).