Skip to main content
. 2012 May 10;27(4):527–542. doi: 10.1007/s10901-012-9288-3

Table 2.

Two variants of reformed housing association sector proposed by CSED

Integral housing association variant Split-function variant
Method used to activate capital Levy on about 90 % of capital growth, to be paid in annual instalments Annual payment of yield on capital owned by fund (foundation)

Safeguards of public interests

A: housing of lower-income groups

B: prevention of risk selection

C: liveability guarantee

A: Via housing allowance and restrictions on housing association’s target group (households with incomes up to €33,000, 90 % of property assigned to target group) and municipal regulations concerning mixed housing development

B: Via a duty to accept vulnerable groups

C: On basis of performance agreement with municipality

A: Via housing allowance and municipal regulations concerning mixed housing development

B: Via commissioning by municipality

C: Via commissioning by municipality

Responsibility for transparency of objectives and governance Central government via (replacement of) BBSH and (successor to) CFV, municipalities via municipal and/or regional housing visions and performance agreements

Fund (foundation): central government via BBSH

Operating company: external shareholders via wish to maximise profits