Table 2.
Two variants of reformed housing association sector proposed by CSED
| Integral housing association variant | Split-function variant | |
|---|---|---|
| Method used to activate capital | Levy on about 90 % of capital growth, to be paid in annual instalments | Annual payment of yield on capital owned by fund (foundation) |
|
Safeguards of public interests A: housing of lower-income groups B: prevention of risk selection C: liveability guarantee |
A: Via housing allowance and restrictions on housing association’s target group (households with incomes up to €33,000, 90 % of property assigned to target group) and municipal regulations concerning mixed housing development B: Via a duty to accept vulnerable groups C: On basis of performance agreement with municipality |
A: Via housing allowance and municipal regulations concerning mixed housing development B: Via commissioning by municipality C: Via commissioning by municipality |
| Responsibility for transparency of objectives and governance | Central government via (replacement of) BBSH and (successor to) CFV, municipalities via municipal and/or regional housing visions and performance agreements |
Fund (foundation): central government via BBSH Operating company: external shareholders via wish to maximise profits |