Table 2.
Linear regression models examining the relationship between log(SpG-adj BPA) and covariates and anogenital distance measures in newborn daughters ().
Characteristic | AGD-AC | AGD-AF | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Unadjusted | Adjusted | Unadjusted | Adjusted | |
Log(SpG-adj BPA) | ||||
Maternal age | ||||
Infant’s postconception age | 0.54 (0.35, 0.73) | 0.17 (0.02, 0.33) | ||
Weight-for-length z-score | 0.66 (0.35, 0.96) | |||
Race | ||||
Urine collection time | ||||
UCSF center | ||||
URMC center | ||||
UW center | 1.99 (1.07, 2.90) |
Note: AGD-AC, anogenital distance from the anus to the clitoris; AGD-AF, anogenital distance from the anus to the fourchette; BPA, Bisphenol A; mm, millimeters; CI, confidence interval; SpG-adj, specific gravity–adjusted; UCSF, University of California, San Francisco; URMC, University of Rochester Medical Center; UW, University of Washington. For race, the referent is non-Hispanic, white. For center, the referent is UMN. All other variables are continuous.