Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 11;125(7):077008. doi: 10.1289/EHP875

Table 2.

Linear regression models examining the relationship between log(SpG-adj BPA) and covariates and anogenital distance measures in newborn daughters (n=381).

Characteristic AGD-AC AGD-AF
Unadjusted β(95%CI) Adjusted β(95%CI) Unadjusted β(95%CI) Adjusted β(95%CI)
Log(SpG-adj BPA) 0.36(0.78,0.06) 0.56(0.97,0.15) 0.16(0.19,0.52) 0.03(0.30,0.37)
Maternal age   0.05(0.13,0.03)   0.08(0.14,0.01)
Infant’s postconception age   0.54 (0.35, 0.73)   0.17 (0.02, 0.33)
Weight-for-length z-score   0.66 (0.35, 0.96)   0.22(0.02,0.47)
Race   0.30(0.54,1.13)   0.06(0.73,0.62)
Urine collection time   0.04(0.11,0.20)   0.04(0.08,0.17)
UCSF center   0.61(0.54,1.75)   1.53(2.46,0.61)
URMC center   0.47(1.63,0.68)   1.09(2.02,0.16)
UW center   0.08(1.06,1.22)   1.99 (1.07, 2.90)

Note: AGD-AC, anogenital distance from the anus to the clitoris; AGD-AF, anogenital distance from the anus to the fourchette; BPA, Bisphenol A; mm, millimeters; CI, confidence interval; SpG-adj, specific gravity–adjusted; UCSF, University of California, San Francisco; URMC, University of Rochester Medical Center; UW, University of Washington. For race, the referent is non-Hispanic, white. For center, the referent is UMN. All other variables are continuous.