Table 2.
Isomer | a | b | GMc | GSDc | Min | 10th% | 25th% | Median | 75th% | 90th% | Max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p,p′-DDT | 98.0 | 90.7 | 69.6 | 6.7 | 8.1 | 19.0 | 55.3 | 259.3 | 946.2 | 15027.6 | |
o,p′-DDT | 90.5 | 66.6 | - | - | 7.1 | 22.6 | 72.0 | 2029.3 | |||
p,p′-DDE | 100.0 | 97.2 | 287.9 | 4.8 | 44.7 | 91.8 | 242.2 | 878.7 | 2577.7 | 26301.3 | |
o,p′-DDE | 82.7 | 48.2 | - | - | 6.9 | 13.0 | 117.5 |
. LOD for p,p′-DDT, o,p′-DDT, and o,p′-DDE was and the LOD for p,p′-DDE was 0.03 .
. LOQ for p,p′-DDT, o,p′-DDT, and o,p′-DDE was and the LOQ for p,p′-DDE was .
, . GM and GSD not calculated for o,p′ isomers due to lower detection frequencies. For p,p′-DDT/E, GM and GSD calculations include values below the LOD using imputed values from maximum likelihood estimates of the lognormal distribution and values below the LOQ, but above the LOD, using GC/MS machine-read values.