Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61(2):601–611. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170576

Table 3.

Predicted V̇O2peak values

Exercise Variable Satisfy Criteria Not Satisfy Criteria Cohen’s d effect size
Sample size 85 21 -
Absolute values
OUES75 Predicted V̇O2peak, mL·min−1 2051 (534) 2133 (674) .13
Absolute V̇O2peak – OUES75 Predicted V̇O2peak 0.92 (285) −121.3 (302) .42
OUES90 Predicted V̇O2peak, mL·min−1 2053 (547) 2131 (689) .13
Absolute V̇O2peak – OUES90 Predicted V̇O2peak −0.91 (261) −119.0 (296) .42
OUES100 Predicted V̇O2peak, mL·min−1 2051 (550) 2143 (700) .15
Absolute V̇O2peak – OUES100 Predicted V̇O2peak 0.82 (252) −130.8 (285) 1.1
Normalized values
OUES75normalized Predicted V̇O2peak, mL·kg·min−1 26.4 (4.7) 26.7 (7.4) .05
Normalized V̇O2peak –OUES75normalized Predicted V̇O2peak 0.01 (3.5) −2.20 (3.0) .68
OUES90normalized Predicted V̇O2peak, mL·kg·min−1 26.4 (4.8) 26.5 (7.6) .02
Normalized V̇O2peak –OUES90normalized Predicted V̇O2peak 0.01 (3.4) −2.15 (3.0) .67
OUES100normalized Predicted V̇O2peak, mL·kg·min−1 26.4 (4.8) 26.6 (7.4) .03
Normalized V̇O2peak –OUES100normalized Predicted V̇O2peak 0.01 (3.3) −2.31 (3.1) .72

OUES = oxygen uptake efficiency slope; V̇O2peak = peak oxygen consumption.

Values significantly different (p < .05) from 0 (one sample t-test).