Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 13;2017:9067875. doi: 10.1155/2017/9067875

Table 2.

Body weight of mice exposed to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) submitted to 12 weeks of exercise training.

CON PM2.5 MIT MIT + PM2.5 HIT HIT + PM2.5 ANOVA (P value)
Before 19.0 ± 3.0 18.5 ± 3.1 18.0 ± 1.8 17.6 ± 2.3 19.0 ± 1.7 19.5 ± 2.2 0.832
4th week 24.6 ± 2.2 24.9 ± 2.1§ 23.5 ± 2.7 23.1 ± 2.3 24.9 ± 0.5 22.2 ± 4.0 0.414
8th week 27.3 ± 1.8§ 28.1 ± 2.7§ 24.7 ± 2.5 27.1 ± 3.0§ 25.3 ± 0.9 25.2 ± 3.9 0.214
12th week 28.0 ± 3.6§ 28.7 ± 2.8§ 26.7 ± 2.2 27.9 ± 2.9§ 26.7 ± 2.5§ 26.0 ± 3.3 0.650
Δ (12th week − before) 8.9 ± 4.5 9.1 ± 4.4 8.6 ± 3.2 8.8 ± 3.7 8.1 ± 3.1 6.4 ± 4.7 0.896

Body weight (g) expressed as mean ± standard deviation. CON: control group, received 10 μL saline daily, maintained sedentary. MIT: moderate intensity training group, received 10 μL saline daily. HIT: high intensity training group, received 10 μL saline daily. PM2.5: exposure group, received 5 μg of PM2.5 daily, maintained sedentary. MIT + PM2.5: moderate intensity training group, received 5 μg of PM2.5 daily. HIT + PM2.5: high intensity training group, received 5 μg of PM2.5 daily (n = 5-6 per group). Data analysed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test. There was an effect of time (P < 0.001) and no effect of treatment (P = 0.129) or interaction between time and treatment (P = 0.854). Time effects are indicated as P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and §P < 0.001 versus initial body weight (“before” data) in each respective group. The difference between final and initial body weight (Δ body weight 12th week − before) was not different among experimental groups (P = 0.911).