Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 21;27(Suppl 3):11. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2017.27.3.12553

Table 2.

Differences between Smallpox, polio and measles eradication programs

Smallpox Polio Measles
Biological and technical feasibility
Etiologic agent Virus Virus Virus
Nonhuman reservoir No No No
Effective intervention tool Smallpox vaccine Oral vaccine Injectable vaccine
Simple/practical diagnostic Clinical diagnosis, confirmed by microscopy (If needed) Stool culture IgM
Sensitive surveillance Facility and community based Facility-based Facility based
Field-proven strategies Americas, West Africa Americas Americas
Cost and Benefits
Cases averted per year >100,000 350,000 >100,000,000
Coincident benefits Creation of Expanded Programme on Immunization Improved immunization and bio-surveillance Improved routine immunization and surveillance
Intangible benefits Culture of prevention and social equity Culture of prevention and social equity Culture of prevention and social equity
Estimated annual direct global savings >$100 million per year; averted US$1.5 billion >US$2 billion
Estimated total external financing c. $100-125 million US$2.0-2.5 billion (as of 2000) $7.8 billion [39]
Social and political considerations
Political commitment (endemic/industrial countries) Variable/strong Variable/strong Variable
Social support (endemic/industrial countries) Variable/strong Variable/strong Variable
Core partnerships and advocates WHO, CDC WHO, Rotary, CDC, UNICEF WHO, CDC, UNICEF, American Red Cross, UN Foundation
Technical consensus WHA resolutions World Health Assembly Regional resolutions

Note: The first and third columns are reproduced from R. B. Aylward et al., “When is a Disease Eradicable? 100 Years of Lessons Learned”. The second and fourth columns have been added for this article.