Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 28;17:891. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3885-1

Table 1.

Dietary supplement use of the study population and according to cancer sites of cancer survivorsa

All Female Male
Number Dietary supplement use % (SE) Number Dietary supplement use % (SE) Number Dietary supplement use % (SE)
Cancer-free individuals 10,387 22.1 (0.6) 6154 26.0 (0.7) 4233 18.1 (0.8)
Cancer survivors 400 33.3 (2.8) 260 37.0 (3.6) 140 26.7 (4.7)
P valueb < 0.001 0.001 0.04
By cancer site
Stomach 71 29.8 (6.1) 27 38.3 (11.4) 44 23.9 (7.0)
Cervix or corpus uteri 67 38.1 (7.2) 67 38.1 (7.2) 0
Thyroid 63 31.7 (6.5) 54 31.7 (7.1) 9 31.6 (16.3)
Breast 59 55.9 (7.0) 59 55.9 (7.0) 0
Colorectal 52 22.5 (5.9) 27 18.5 (8.1) 25 26.6 (8.6)
Bladder 14 28.7 (4.0) 5 23.1 (0.0) 9 31.5 (5.9)
Lung 13 23.0 (11.4) 4 49.6 (28.3) 9 15.7 (5.4)
Prostate 12 19.4 (7.0) 0 12 19.4 (7.0)
Liver 11 25.8 (6.4) 2 0.0 9 28.5 (7.1)
Renal 9 0.0 4 0.0 5 0.0
Othersc 46 29.2 (6.0) 20 25.1 (12.7) 26 32.0 (8.4)

aCancer survivors with multiple cancer sites were counted multiple times; 11 participants had been diagnosed with cancer at two sites, and 3 participants had been diagnosed with cancer at three sites among the 400 cancer survivors

bRao-Scott chi-square p values were obtained using PROC SURVEYFREQ to compare the proportion of dietary supplement use between cancer survivors and cancer-free individuals

cOthers included 19 cancer sites (e.g., larynx, lymphoma, skin, ovarian, and esophageal)