Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 28.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Trop. 2013 May 24;127(3):226–235. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.05.009

Table 4.

Comparisons of schistosomiasis knowledge, attitudes towards treatment, PPE wearing and defecation practices in the intervention and control groups.

Averaged unadjusted
results*
Unadjusted
group difference
(95% CI)
Adjusted group
difference
(95% CI)
Control
(N = 77)
Intervention
(N =131 )
Knowledge score (out of 100)
Baseline 37.3 37.5 1.91 (−6.64, 10.46) 2.31 (−5.17, 9.79)
First follow-up (06/2009) 42.1 46.8 6.09 (−1.11, 12.55) 7.07 (1.03, 13.12)
Second follow-up (12/2009) 50.6 55.2 5.23 (−2.60, 13.06) 4.91 (−4.06, 13.87)
Attitude score (out of 100)
Baseline 81.2 82.6 3.21 (−1.53, 9.74) 2.26 (−2.68, 7.19)
First follow-up (06/2009) 82.5 84.5 1.87 (−3.32, 7.06) 1.55 (−4.20, 7.29)
Second follow-up (12/2009) 87.3 91.0 2.56 (−2.28, 7.40) 3.65 (−1.75, 9.05)
PPE wearing behaviour score (out of 100)
Baseline 28.8 30.2 2.20 (−6.12, 10.53) 1.74 (−6.12, 9.60)
First follow-up (06/2009) 14.1 14.1 1.62 (−4.24, 7.48) 1.78 (−4.18, 7.74)
Second follow-up (12/2009) 24.9 30.4 5.05 (−2.26, 12.38) 4.42 (−3.38, 12.22)
Defecation behaviour (binary)
Baseline 18.7 17.0 1.09 (0.27, 4.43) 1.54 (0.45, 5.24)
First follow-up (06/2009) 10.3 8.1 1.19 (0.27, 5.21) 1.21 (0.32, 4.53)
Second follow-up (12/2009) 7.0 2.4 2.53 (0.44, 14.39) 3.28 (0.57, 18.98)
*

For the knowledge, attitude and PPE wearing sections, cells represent the averaged unadjusted scores; for the “defecation” question, cells represent the proportions of people who DID defecate in the fields.

For the knowledge, attitude and PPE wearing sections, cells represent score differences based on regression results; positive numbers correspond to higher scores in the intervention group. For the “defecation” question, cells represent the odds ratios (intervention group/control group) of NOT defecating in the fields.

Adjusted for age, gender, education, occupation and county.