Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 17;2017:3616875. doi: 10.1155/2017/3616875

(a) Progesterone agents versus control treatments

Quality assessment Number of patients (%) Absolute effect (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) Quality Importance
No. of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication bias Progesterone agents Control Progesterone agents Control
Outcome: miscarriage

Progesterone versus control

7 Randomized trials Seriousa Not serious Not serious Seriousb None 52/399 (13.0) 82/378 (21.7) 128 per 1000 217 per 1000 OR 0.53 (0.36 to 0.78) ⨁⨁◯◯ Low Critical
89 fewer per 1,000
(from 39 fewer to 126 fewer)

Oral dydrogesterone versus control

3 Randomized trials Seriousa Not serious Not serious Seriousb None 30/256 (11.7) 53/235 (22.6) 112 per 1000 226 per 1000 OR 0.43 (0.26 to 0.71) ⨁⨁◯◯ Low Critical
114 fewer per 1,000 (from 54 fewer to 155 fewer)

Vaginal progesterone versus control

4 Randomized trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None 22/143 (15.4) 29/143 (20.3) 155 per 1000 203 per 1000 OR 0.72 (0.39 to 1.34) ⨁⨁⨁⨁ High Critical
48 fewer per 1,000 (from 51 more to 113 fewer)

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; aeither the participants or personnel were not blinded in these studies (performance bias); bthe 95% CI includes appreciable harm or benefit.