Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Image Process. 2015 Aug 11;25(1):53–64. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2015.2467217

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Comparison of SIFT [33], CPD [11], RPM-L2E [28] and PR-GLS for feature correspondence. Left: number of correct matches; right: matching score. The horizontal axis corresponds to the six image pair in Fig. 5 (from left to right, top to bottom).