Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 3;5(4):24. doi: 10.3390/proteomes5040024

Table 3.

Odds ratios and confidence intervals of different patient groups.

Risk Factor (n Patients)
Diseased not Diseased
Groups Antigen yes no yes no OR 95% CI
asymptomatic (n = 17) vs. atrophic (n = 17) CagA 14 3 8 9 5.3 1.1–25.2
VacA m1 8 9 2 15 6.7 1.2–38.6
HP0231 10 7 6 11 2.6 0.7–10.5
asymptomatic (n = 40) vs. intestinal metaplasia (n = 40) CagA 36 4 24 16 6.0 1.8–20.2
VacA m1 9 31 6 34 1.7 0.5–5.2
HP0231 14 26 19 21 0.6 0.2–1.5
asymptomatic (n = 51) vs. premalignant changes (n = 57) CagA 50 7 28 23 5.9 2.2–15.4
VacA m1 17 40 8 43 2.3 0.9–5.9
HP0231 24 33 24 27 0.8 0.4–1.8
asymptomatic (n = 14) vs. ulcer (n = 14) CagA 10 4 7 7 2.5 0.5–11.9
VacA m1 3 11 12 2 1.6 0.2–11.7
HP0231 5 9 7 7 0.6 0.1–2.5

The samples of the compared groups were matched for age and gender. The atrophic and intestinal metaplasia status were taken together as “premalignant changes” and also compared to the asymptomatic group of samples.