Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 16;6(4):18. doi: 10.3390/ht6040018

Table 1.

Validation results and acceptance criteria.

Validation Parameter Acceptance Criteria Results Conclusion
Calibration model 80–120% recovery
CV < 20%
four-parameteric logistics (1/Y2)
99–101% recovery CV < 20%
Complies
ULoQ 80–120% recovery
CV < 20%
900 pg·mL−1
102% recovery
CV 5.0%
Complies
LLoQ 80–120% recovery
CV < 20%
1.23 pg·mL−1
101% recovery
CV 15.3%
Complies
LoD (pg·mL−1) zero calibrator +3× SD 0.44 pg·mL−1
Intra-assay precision mid-range: CV < 15%
high-/low-range: CV < 20%
CV 13.5%
CV 12.9–15.3%
Complies
Inter-assay precision CV < 20% CV 10.7–19.4% Complies
Recovery 80–120% recovery 90–99% recovery Complies
Dilutional linearity 80–120% recovery 82–117% recovery Complies
Parallelism 80–120% recovery 91–115% recovery Complies
Analyte stability 80–120% recovery 83–105% recovery Complies

CV: coefficient of variation; ULoQ: upper limit of quantification; LLoQ: lower limit of quantification.