Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 26;5(4):31. doi: 10.3390/vaccines5040031

Table 1.

Protection efficacy in different groups of chickens against vvIBDV challenge.

Sl. No Groups a Mortality b B/B Ratio c Bursal Lesion Score d Protection Percentage
1 Unvaccinated unchallenged - 0.67 ± 0.28 0 ± 0 -
2 Unvaccinated challenged 10/10 (100%) 0.24 ±0.09 4.6 ± 0.2 0/10 (0%)
3 Live IBDV vaccine 0/10 (0%) 0.48 ± 0.01 2.2 ± 0.2 10/10 (100%)
4 Inactivated IBDV killed vaccine 1/10 (10%) 0.43 ± 0.02 2.8 ± 0.2 9/10 (90%)
5 rNDV F/VP2 0/10 (0%) 0.54 ±0.02 2.0 ± 0.2 10/10 (100%)

a Mortality was recorded during 10 days period after virus challenge and presented as number of dead chickens/total number of chickens in each group and percentage in parenthesis. b Bursa/Body weight ratios was calculated by bursal weight divided by body weight × 100 and presented as the mean ± standard deviation from each group. c Bursal lesion score was measured from 0 to 4 based on the increasing severity of bursal lesions; (0) no lesions, (1) mild scattered cell depletion in a few follicles, (2) moderate with 1/3–1/2 of the follicles atrophied or with depleted cells, (3) diffuse with atrophy in all follicles, (4) acute inflammation and necrosis typical of IBD and expressed as the mean ± standard deviation from each group. d Protection percentage was determined as the number of protected chickens/total number of chickens in a group ×100.