Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 5;8(12):365. doi: 10.3390/genes8120365

Table 1.

Tests for positive selection among codons of SmSABATH genes using site models.

Model np lnL Estimates of Parameter 1 2ΔlnL Positive Selection Sites 2
Frequency dN/dS
M0 (one-ratio) 60 −24,100.940606 0.32227 None
M3 (discrete) 64 −23,631.868500 p0 = 0.15469
p1 = 0.41191
p2 = 0.43340
ω0 = 0.06316
ω1 = 0.25310
ω2 = 0.65803
938.1442 (M3 vs. M0) ** Not allowed
M1a (nearly neutral) 61 −23,766.855086 p0 = 0.53255
p1 = 0.46745
ω0 = 0.23043
ω1 = 1.00000
None
M2a (positive selection) 63 −23,766.855086 p0 = 0.53255
p1 = 0.30714
p2 = 0.16031
ω0 = 0.23043
ω1 = 1.00000
ω2 = 1.00000
0 (M2a vs. M1a) Not allowed
M7 (beta) 61 −23,622.773935 p = 1.10441
q = 1.67064
None
M8 (beta & ω) 63 −23,622.775486 p0 = 0.99999
p = 1.10448
q = 1.67080
p1 = 0.00001
ω = 5.70606 0.00308 (M8 vs. M7) 181 Q 432 V
434 G 460 S
476 H 479 C

Note: * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 (x2 test). 1 ω was estimated under models; p and q were the parameters of the beta distribution. 2 The number of amino acid sites estimated to have undergone positive selection. np was the number of parameter. lnL was the values of log-likelihood. dN/dS was non-synonymous/synonymous. 2ΔlnL was the value of twice the log likelihood difference between models.