Table 1.
Reference | Blood Sample Type | Equation and Pearson’s Correlation [39] | Omega-3 Index Equivalence at Baseline | Omega-3 Index Equivalence Post-Intervention | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Svensson et al. 2006 [24] | Serum phospholipid fatty acids | Y = 0.93x + 0.55 R = 0.94 |
6.1% | 9.8% | Myocardial infarction 3.9% versus 12.6% (p = 0.036) Major coronary events 6.8% versus 16.5% (p = 0.043) Note the large increase in omega-3 fatty acid status (38%) achieved Omega-3 fatty acid status is in the cardio-protective zone. |
Einvik et al. 2010 [29] | Serum fatty acids | Y = 0.94x + 1.17 R = 0.74 |
6.8% | 10.6% | All-cause mortality 5% versus 8.5% (p = 0.063) Note the large increase in omega-3 fatty acid status (36%) achieved Omega-3 fatty acid status is in the cardio-protective zone. |
Kromhout et al. 2010 [27] | Plasma cholesteryl esters fatty acids | Y = 1.59x + 2.05 R = 0.85 |
7.0% | 8.4% | No significant outcomes. Note the small increase in omega-3 fatty acid status (17%) achieved. |
Galan et al. 2010 [30] | Plasma fatty acids | Y = 0.94x + 1.17 R = 0.74 |
4.7% | 6.0% | No significant outcomes. Note the small increase in omega-3 fatty acid status (22%) achieved. Omega-3 fatty acid status of 6% is not in the cardio-protective zone |
Wu et al. 2013 [33] | Serum phospholipid fatty acids | Y = 0.93x + 0.55 R = 0.94 |
4.7% | 6.2% | No significant outcomes. Note the small increase in omega-3 fatty acid status (24%) achieved. Omega-3 fatty acid status of 6% is not in the cardio-protective zone |