Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 11;9(12):1345. doi: 10.3390/nu9121345

Table 1.

Summary of included studies.

Study Setting Study Design Population
Soy protein (contains isoflavones)
Fanti et al. 2006 [40]
  • USA

  • Unknown number and type of recruitment sites

  • Data collected: dates not specified

  • Two-arm parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial

  • Allocation method: random allocation 2:1

  • ESRD on haemodialysis. Primary disease 44% DM, 36% HTN, 20% other.

  • n = 32 participants; n = 19 IG; n = 13 CG. Attrition: 22% (n = 15 IG; n = 10 CG)

  • Mean age 61.0 ± 2.9 years; 40% female.

Chen et al. 2005 [42]
  • Taiwan

  • 1 hemodialysis centre, from a general hospital.

  • Data collected: dates not specified

  • Two-arm parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial

  • Allocation method: random allocation 1:1

  • ESRD on haemodialysis. Primary diseases not described.

  • n = 42 participants; n = 18 IG; n = 19 CG (post attrition numbers). Attrition: 12%.

  • Participants divided into normolipidemic (n = 10 CG; n = 9 IG) and hyperlipidemic (n = 9 CG; n = 10 IG)

  • Mean age 59–66 ± 9–13 years; 92% female.

Chen et al. 2006 [41]
  • Taiwan

  • 1 hemodialysis centre, from a general hospital.

  • Data collected: dates not specified

  • Two-arm parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial

  • Allocation method: random allocation 1:1

  • ESRD on haemodialysis and all with hypercholesterolaemia. Primary diseases not described.

  • n = 29 participants; n = 18 IG; n = 19 CG (post attrition numbers). Attrition: 11%.

  • Participants divided into normolipidemic (n = 13 CG; n = 13 IG) and hyperlipidemic (n = 9 CG; n = 10 IG)

  • Mean age 58–59 ± 11–12 years; 27% female.

Siefker & DiSilvestro 2006 [43]
  • USA

  • 2 hemodialysis centres, from 2 general hospitals.

  • Data collected: dates not specified

  • Two-arm parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial

  • Allocation method: random allocation 1:1

  • ESRD on haemodialysis and all with hypercholesterolaemia. Primary diseases not described.

  • n = 20 participants; n = 8 IG; n = 9 CG (post attrition numbers). Attrition: 15%.

  • Mean age 20 years (range 27–77); 59% female.

Grape (contains various polyphenols)
Janiques et al. 2014 [25]
  • Brazil

  • 1 nephrology centre

  • Data collected: dates not specified

  • Two-arm parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial

  • Allocation method: random allocation 1:1

  • ESRD on haemodialysis. Primary diseases not described.

  • n = 34 participants; n = 17 IG; n = 17 CG. Attrition: 6% (n = 16 IG; n = 16 CG).

  • Mean age 52.7–53.0 ± 9.8–13.7 years; 44% female.

Turmeric (contains curcuminoids)
Pakfetrat et al. 2014 [38]
  • Iran

  • 1 haemodialysis centre

  • Data collected: 2011–2012

  • Two-arm parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial

  • Allocation method: random allocation 1:1

  • ESRD on haemodialysis, all with uremic pruritus. Primary diseases not described.

  • n = 100 participants; n = 50 IG; n = 50 CG. Attrition: 0%.

  • Mean age 51.0–55.6 ± 14.7–16.6 years; 40% female.

Pakfetrat et al. 2015 a [27]
  • Iran

  • 1 haemodialysis centre

  • Data collected: dates not specified

  • Two-arm parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial

  • Allocation method: random allocation 1:1

  • ESRD on haemodialysis, all with uremic pruritus. Primary diseases: 35% DM, 33% HTN.

  • n = 50 participants; n = 50 IG; n = 50 CG. Attrition: 4%.

  • Mean age 47–52 ± 15 years; 45% female.

Cocoa (contains flavanols)
Rassaf et al. 2016 [28]
  • Germany

  • 1 renal centre

  • Data collected: 2012–2013

  • Two-arm parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial

  • Allocation method: random allocation 1:1

  • ESRD on haemodialysis, all with uremic pruritus. Primary diseases: 32% HTN, 23% DM, 19% GN, 26% other.

  • n = 52 participants; n = 26 IG; n = 26 CG. Attrition: 6% (n = 24 IG; n = 25 CG).

  • Mean age 65 ± 13 years; 26% female.

Pomegranate (Phenolic acids & Flavanoids)
Shema-Didi et al. 2012 [37]
  • Israel

  • 1 dialysis centre in a hospital

  • Data collected: dates not specified.

  • Two-arm parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial

  • Allocation method: random allocation 2:1

  • ESRD on haemodialysis. Primary diseases: 64% DM, 60% CVD.

  • n = 101 participants; n = 66 IG; n = 35 CG. Attrition: 34% (n = 41 IG; n = 26 CG).

  • Mean age 66–68 ± 11–13 years; 45% female.

Shema-Didi et al. 2014 [36] As per Shema-Didi et al. 2012 [37] Shema-Didi et al. 2012 [37] Shema-Didi et al. 2012 [37]
Shema-Didi et al. 2013 [26]
  • Israel

  • 1 dialysis centre in a hospital

  • Data collected: dates not specified.

  • Two-arm parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial.

  • Allocation method: random allocation 2:1

  • ESRD on haemodialysis, receiving an iron transfusion during a single haemodialysis session. Primary diseases: 60% DM, 51% CVD. Others not described.

  • n = 27 participants; n = 17 IG; n = 10 CG. Attrition: N/A

  • Mean age 65–67 ± 11–13 years; 40% female.

Wu et al. 2015 [44]
  • USA

  • Unknown number of dialysis clinics in two cities

  • Data collected: dates not specified.

  • Two-arm parallel, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised trial

  • Allocation method: random allocation 1:1

  • ESRD on haemodialysis. Primary diseases: 49% HTN, 36% DM. Others not described.

  • n = 33 participants; n = 16 IG; n = 17 CG. Attrition: 19% (n = 13 IG; n = 14 CG).

  • Mean age 53–56 ± 3 years; 39% female.

CVD, Cardiovascular Disease; CG, control group; DM, Diabetes Mellitus; HTN, hyptertension; IG, intervention group; N/A, Not Applicable; a It is unclear if the sample and study is the same as that described in Pakfetrat et al. 2014 [38]. The samples appear to be the same; where Pakfetrat et al. [27] excluded some participants after recruitment, which could explain slight differences in sample characteristics. However, Pakfetrat et al. 2015 [27] does not refer to the earlier study at all, and therefore it is not clear.