Table 3. F_CDF calculated from F_96–100 for I_Ca and I_Ba from 100-Hz protocol.

Construct	F96-100 for ICa	F96-100 for IBa	P-value, ICa vs. IBaa	FCDF	P-value vs. Cav2.1b	P-value vs. Cav2.2ab
Cav2.2-CT2.1	1.09 ± 0.03 (15)	0.89 ± 0.03 (15)	<0.001	0.20 ± 0.03 (15)	1.000
Cav2.2-pCT2.1	1.07 ± 0.02 (13)	0.93 ± 0.02 (11)	<0.001	0.14 ± 0.02 (13)	0.370
Cav2.2-dCT2.1	0.90 ± 0.03 (8)	0.92 ± 0.02 (10)	0.914	0.02 ± 0.03 (8)	<0.001
Cav2.2-EF2.1	0.85 ± 0.03 (10)	0.88 ± 0.03 (10)	0.520	−0.03 ± 0.03 (10)	<0.001
Cav2.2-pre-IQ-IQ2.1	0.90 ± 0.03 (10)	0.92 ± 0.02 (12)	0.583	−0.02 ± 0.03 (10)	<0.001
Cav2.2-CBD2.1	0.99 ± 0.03 (10)	0.93 ± 0.02 (11)	0.149	0.06 ± 0.03 (10)	0.006
Cav2.2-pre-IQ-IQ-CBD2.1	0.95 ± 0.02 (11)	0.95 ± 0.04 (6)	0.689	0.00 ± 0.02 (11)	<0.001
Cav2.2-EF&CBD2.1	0.89 ± 0.03 (12)	0.86 ± 0.02 (10)	0.508	0.03 ± 0.03 (12)	0.001
Cav2.2-EF-pre-IQ-IQ2.1	1.07 ± 0.03 (18)	0.94 ± 0.03 (13)	0.004	0.13 ± 0.03 (18)	0.851
Cav2.1-CT2.2	1.08 ± 0.04 (10)	1.08 ± 0.02 (5)	0.966	0.00 ± 0.04 (10)		1.000
Cav2.1-pCT2.2	1.05 ± 0.02 (5)	1.01 ± 0.02 (7)	0.073	0.04 ± 0.02 (5)		1.000
Cav2.1-dCT2.2	1.24 ± 0.03 (4)	1.02 ± 0.02 (3)	0.024	0.22 ± 0.03 (4)		0.054
Cav2.1-EF2.2	1.08 ± 0.03 (4)	1.02 ± 0.02 (6)	0.257	0.06 ± 0.03 (4)		1.000
Cav2.1-pre-IQ-IQ2.2	1.03 ± 0.01 (8)	1.03 ± 0.02 (6)	0.831	0.00 ± 0.02 (8)		1.000
Cav2.1-CBD2.2	1.27 ± 0.02 (8)	1.04 ± 0.04 (10)	<0.001	0.23 ± 0.02 (8)		0.005
Cav2.1-EF-pre-IQ-IQ2.2	1.05 ± 0.01 (11)	1.06 ± 0.02 (11)	0.645	−0.01 ± 0.00 (11)		1.000

F_CDF and F_96-100 (mean ± SEM) were determined as indicated in the text. Number of cells in parentheses.

^aDetermined by Student’s t test.

^bDetermined by Kruskal–Wallis test and post-hoc Dunn's test.