Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 24;65(8):1102–1115. doi: 10.1136/jim-2017-000524

Table 1.

Overview of intervention studies which have investigated the effect of hypercaloric feeding on liver fat content

Ref Design Subjects Intervention Energy excess Duration Change in body mass Change in liver fat
124 SG 7 M
24.7±1.3 years
19–25 kg/m2a
StdD+Fru (1.5 g/kg) 18% 4 weeks NSD NSD
115 R/P 16 M T2DM offspring (24.7±1.3 years) 19–25 kg/m2aversus 8M Con (24±1 years)
19–25 kg/m2a
StdD versus StdD+Fru (3.5 g/kg/FFM) 35% 7 days T2DM offspring: ↑ 1.0 kgb*
Con: ↑ 0.6 kgb*
NSD between groups
T2DM off: ↑ 79%*
Controls: ↑ 76%*
NSD between groups
114 R/P 32 M
18-50 yearsa
25.9–32.2 kg/m2c
StdD+Glu (25%TE) versus
Fru (25%TE)
25% 2 weeks Fru: ↑ 1.0±1.4 kg*
Glu: ↑ 0.6±1.0 kg*
NSD between groups
Fru: ↑ 24%b*
Glu: ↑ 26%b*
NSD between groups
116 R/C 11 M
24.6±0.6 years
19–25 kg/m2a
StdD+Fru (3.5 g/kg/FFM) versus Glu (3.5 g/kg/FFM) 35% 7 days Fru: ↑ 0.6 kgb*
Glu: ↑ 1 kgb*
Fru: ↑ 52%±13%*
Glu: ↑ 58%±23%
NSD between groups
125 R/P 20 M+F
30.5±2.0 years
25.9±0.5 kg/m2
StdD+Fru (150 g/day) versus Glu (150 g/day) 600 kcal/day 4 weeks Glu: ↑ 1.7±0.4 kg*
Fru: NSD
NSD in either group
128 R/P 47 M+F
20–50 yearsa
26–40 kg/m2a
StdD+1 L/day of cola, semi-skimmed milk, diet cola, or water Cola: 430 kcal/day
Milk: 450 kcal/day
Diet-cola: N/A
Water: N/A
6 months NSD between groups
No comparisons made relative to baseline
Cola: ↑132%–143% compared with other gps.*
NSD between milk, diet-cola or water
129 SG 16 M+F
54 yearsd (40–59 years)e
30.6±1.2 kg/m2
StdD+added sugars (‘candy diet’) 1000 kcal/day 3 weeks ↑ 1.8±0.3 kg* ↑ 27%*
133 R/P 37 M+F
20-38 yearsa
18–27 kg/m2a
Habitual diet+high SFA or high-n-6 PUFA muffins Adjusted to achieve 3% wt gain at follow-up 7 weeks SFA: ↑ 1.6±0.96 kg
PUFA: ↑ 1.6±0.85 kg.
NSD between groups
SFA: ↑ 58%.b
PUFA: ↑53%b#
132 SG 15 M
25±6.6 yearsf
23.4±2.5 kg/m2f
Habitual diet+280 g/day fat (800 mL cream) 2632 kcal/day 3 days NSD in BMI
Body mass not presented
↑ 112%*b
134 R/C 10 M
24±1 years
22.4±0.6 kg/m2
StdD+HF (+100% fat intakeb) versus HF+high-pro (+100% fat +>100% pro intakeb) HF: 30%b
HF+high-pro: 49%b
4 days HF: NSD
HF+high-pro: ↑ 1.1 kga*
HF: ↑ 90%*
HF+high-pro: ↑ 68%b*#
139 R/P 36 M
22 years (19–27)c
22.5 kg/m2 (19.5–24.5)c
Habitual diet+3 L/day HFHS or HS beverage, consumed 3x daily with meals or 2–3 hours after meal ingestion 40% 6 weeks ↑ 2.5±1.7 kgg*
NSD between groups
NSD in gps consuming beverages with meals
HFHS ↑ 45%* and HS, ↑ 110%*when consumed between meals
NSD in ‘between meals’ groups
117 P 30 M
23.9±0.4 years
22.6±0.2 kg/m2
StdD+Fru (3.5 g/kg/FFM), SFA (+30% TE), versus StdD+Fru+ SFA (3.5 g/kg/FFM and +30% TE) Fru: 35%
SFA: 30%
Fru+SFA: 65%
7 days ↑ 0.3±0.1 kgg
NSD between groups
Fru: ↑ 16%*
SFA: ↑ 86%*
Fru+SFA: ↑ 133%*#
135 R/C 9 M
23.3±0.9 years
22.6±0.5 kg/m2
StdD+high Fru (3 g/kg)+placebo (6.6 g/day maltodextrin) versus high-Fru (3 g/kg)+EAA (20.3 g/day) High-Fru+placebo: 36%b
High-Fru+EAA: 38%b
6 days NSD High-Fru+placebo: ↑ 115%*b
High-Fru+EAA: ↑ 81%b*#

Subject data presented as mean±SEM unless otherwise stated.

a

Inclusion criteria or estimated range within which all participants are included.

b

Estimated from table/graph.

c

Range.

d

Median.

e

IQR.

f

SD.

g

Pooled data.

*Significant effect of intervention (p< 0.05) according to the manuscript.

#

Significant difference between groups (p< 0.05) according to the manuscript.

BMI, body mass index; C, crossover; EAA, essential amino acids; F, Female, T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; FFM, fat-free mass; Fru, fructose; Glu, glucose; HF, high fat; HFHS, high fat and high sugar; HS, high sugar; M, male; N/A, not available; NSD, no significant difference; P, parallel groups; Pro, protein; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; R, randomised; Ref, reference; SFA, saturated fatty acids; SG, single group; StdD, standardised diet; TE, total energy.