Table 5.
Development cohort (n = 4278) | |||||
| |||||
Score cutoff (greater than or equal to) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | No. of patients with score less than cutoff |
| |||||
0 | 100 | 0 | 64 | — | 0 |
1 | 97 | 15 | 67 | 77 | 312 |
2 | 93 | 32 | 70 | 72 | 688 |
3 | 85 | 50 | 75 | 66 | 1184 |
4 | 77 | 61 | 78 | 60 | 1579 |
5 | 68 | 73 | 81 | 56 | 2019 |
6 | 55 | 83 | 85 | 52 | 2509 |
7 | 44 | 91 | 89 | 48 | 2921 |
8 | 31 | 95 | 92 | 44 | 3364 |
9 | 24 | 97 | 93 | 42 | 3591 |
10 | 14 | 99 | 95 | 40 | 3888 |
11 | 9 | 99 | 97 | 39 | 4016 |
13 | 3 | 100 | 97 | 37 | 4190 |
| |||||
Validation cohort (n = 2837) | |||||
| |||||
Score cutoff (greater than or equal to) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | No. of patients with score less than cutoff |
| |||||
0 | 100 | 0 | 64 | — | 0 |
1 | 98 | 16 | 68 | 81 | 204 |
2 | 93 | 35 | 72 | 75 | 480 |
3 | 86 | 53 | 76 | 68 | 799 |
4 | 78 | 64 | 80 | 62 | 1066 |
5 | 68 | 74 | 82 | 56 | 1337 |
6 | 55 | 84 | 86 | 51 | 1664 |
7 | 44 | 90 | 88 | 47 | 1941 |
8 | 29 | 95 | 92 | 43 | 2255 |
9 | 24 | 97 | 94 | 42 | 2370 |
10 | 14 | 99 | 96 | 39 | 2569 |
11 | 9 | 100 | 98 | 38 | 2672 |
12 | 2 | 100 | 100 | 36 | 2797 |
13 | 2 | 100 | 100 | 36 | 2798 |
Abbreviations: NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.