Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 2.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Jul 3;21(9):1531–1541. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0481-T

Table 3.

OR (and 95% CI) for prostate cancer associated with quartile concentrations of IGF-I or a doubling in IGF-I concentration in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

Fourth of circulating IGF-I concentrationa
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 ORdoublingb P trend c P heterogeneity d
Overall prostate
 cancerb
Cases/
 controls (N)
297/386 375/385 419/386 451/385 1,542/1,542
OR (95% CI) 1 (ref) 1.31 (1.05, 1.62) 1.51 (1.21, 1.88) 1.69 (1.35, 2.13) 1.38 (1.17, 1.64) 0.0002
Prostate cancer stageb,e
 Localized stage Cases/
 controls (N)
146/196 186/195 208/174 205/180 745/745
OR (95% CI) 1 (ref) 1.29 (0.95, 1.76) 1.69 (1.24, 2.30) 1.65 (1.19, 2.27) 1.40 (1.10, 1.78) 0.01
 Advanced stage Cases/
 controls (N)
57/83 84/68 71/77 97/81 309/309 0.84
OR (95% CI) 1 (ref) 2.05 (1.22, 3.44) 1.58 (0.95, 2.63) 2.15 (1.26, 3.68) 1.46 (1.01, 2.12) 0.04
Histological gradeb,f
Low grade Cases/
 controls (N)
165/208 197/212 218/196 268/232 848/848
OR (95% CI) 1 (ref) 1.19 (0.89, 1.59) 1.46 (1.09, 1.96) 1.57 (1.17, 2.10) 1.36 (1.09, 1.69) 0.01
High grade Cases/
 controls (N)
37/45 46/34 40/36 36/44 159/159 0.19
OR (95% CI) 1 (ref) 1.79 (0.90, 3.56) 1.48 (0.75, 2.94) 1.05 (0.52, 2.10) 0.95 (0.58, 1.55) 0.84
Time to diagnosisb
<4 y Cases/
 controls (N)
93/136 88/90 107/90 169/141 457/457
OR (95% CI) 1 (ref) 1.57 (1.03, 2.39) 1.96 (1.29, 2.99) 2.01 (1.35, 2.99) 1.39 (1.08, 1.80) 0.01
4–7 y Cases/
 controls (N)
122/145 135/139 154/139 149/137 560/560
OR (95% CI) 1 (ref) 1.13 (0.80, 1.61) 1.33 (0.94, 1.90) 1.37 (0.94, 2.00) 1.29 (0.96, 1.71) 0.08 0.77
>7 y Cases/
 controls (N)
82/105 152/156 158/157 133/107 525/525
OR (95% CI) 1 (ref) 1.30 (0.89, 1.89) 1.39 (0.95, 2.05) 1.80 (1.17, 2.77) 1.50 (1.04, 2.16) 0.03
Age at diagnosisb
<65 y Cases/
 controls (N)
106/139 166/165 176/185 255/214 703/703
OR (95% CI) 1 (ref) 1.33 (0.95, 1.86) 1.29 (0.92, 1.81) 1.67 (1.19, 2.34) 1.26 (0.99, 1.60) 0.06
≥65 y Cases/
 controls (N)
191/247 209/220 243/201 196/171 839/839 0.33
OR (95% CI) 1 (ref) 1.28 (0.96, 1.70) 1.67 (1.25, 2.22) 1.67 (1.22, 2.28) 1.50 (1.18, 1.92) 0.001
Age at blood collectionb
<60 y Cases/
 controls (N)
113/144 185/184 194/215 262/211 754/754
OR (95% CI) 1 (ref) 1.29 (0.93, 1.79) 1.18 (0.86, 1.64) 1.67 (1.21, 2.32) 1.34 (1.05, 1.70) 0.02
≥60 y Cases/
 controls (N)
184/242 190/201 225/171 189/174 788/788 0.73
OR (95% CI) 1 (ref) 1.28 (0.96, 1.72) 1.87 (1.38, 2.53) 1.65 (1.19, 2.28) 1.43 (1.12, 1.81) 0.003
Assay typeb
IDS-iSYS
 immunoassay
Cases/
 controls (N)
35/48 47/48 36/48 74/48 192/192
(Umeaå, Sweden only) OR (95% CI) 1 (ref) 1.35 (0.75, 2.42) 1.01 (0.54, 1.88) 2.19 (1.21, 3.97) 1.64 (0.97, 2.76) 0.06
DSL-10-5600
 ACTIVE ELISA
Cases/
 controls (N)
262/338 328/337 383/338 377/337 1,350/1,350 0.46
(All centers
 except Umeaå )
OR (95% CI) 1 (ref) 1.30 (1.03, 1.65) 1.57 (1.24, 1.98) 1.61 (1.26, 2.07) 1.35 (1.13, 1.62) 0.001
a

Quartile cutoff points (16.5, 20.6, and 25.3 nmol/L) were defined among control participants for all cohorts combined except Umeaå , Sweden where country specific cutoff points (13.2,16.0, and 18.8 nmol/L) were used to account for variation in IGF-I concentrations attributable to the assay method.

b

Conditioned by matching factors: study center, age at recruitment, time of blood collection, and duration of fasting at blood collection and adjusted for age at blood collection.

c

P values for trend were obtained by replacing the categorical variable with the logarithm of IGF-I concentration; with adjustment for age at blood collection.

d

P for heterogeneity values relate to likelihood ratio χ2 tests of heterogeneity between trends (using the logarithm of IGF-I); with adjustment for age at blood collection.

e

Localized stage includes T0 or T1 or T2 and N0 or NX and M0, or stage coded in the recruitment center as localized and advanced stage includes T3 or T4 and/or N1+ and/or M1, or stage coded in the recruitment center as metastatic.

f

Low grade includes Gleason score ≤7, or cases coded as well differentiated or moderately differentiated according to the WHO grading system and high grade includes Gleason score >7, or cases coded as poorly differentiated or undifferentiated according to the WHO grading system.