Table 2.
What motivates you to measure RA metrics routinely? | N=255* |
---|---|
To facilitate/improve clinical care | 194 (76.1%) |
To incorporate into medical decision making | 160 (62.7%) |
Easy, simple & useful | 123 (48.2%) |
For Medicare PQRS or other quality reporting programs | 105 (41.2%) |
Participation in a research registry v | 47 (18.4%) |
Insurance companies require it | 47 (18.4%) |
Treat-to-Target trials (TICORA, BeST) show impressive data | 70 (27.5%) |
Other | 21 (8.2%) |
Why don’t you collect RA metrics routinely? | N=184* |
Takes too much of my time | 115 (62.5%) |
Not available on my EMR | 64 (34.8%) |
Don’t need them | 54 (29.3%) |
Too many to choose from | 32 (17.4%) |
Not required by payors | 32 (17.4%) |
Value is unproven | 31 (16.8%) |
Requires labs (CRP or ESR) | 26 (14.1%) |
Too difficult or complex | 23 (12.5%) |
Language/communication difficulties (elderly, Spanish-speaking, etc.) | 20 (10.9%) |
responses not required nor mutually exclusive, so row totals do not sum to 100%. Metric physicians provided responses listed in the top half of the table regarding the reasons that they measure quantitatively; non-metric physicians provided the responses listed in the bottom half of the table regarding the reasons that they do not measure quantitatively.