Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Rheumatol. 2017 Nov 15;45(1):40–44. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170548

Table 2.

Reasons physicians do or do not routinely perform quantitative assessment

What motivates you to measure RA metrics routinely? N=255*
To facilitate/improve clinical care 194 (76.1%)
To incorporate into medical decision making 160 (62.7%)
Easy, simple & useful 123 (48.2%)
For Medicare PQRS or other quality reporting programs 105 (41.2%)
Participation in a research registry v 47 (18.4%)
Insurance companies require it 47 (18.4%)
Treat-to-Target trials (TICORA, BeST) show impressive data 70 (27.5%)
Other 21 (8.2%)
Why don’t you collect RA metrics routinely? N=184*
Takes too much of my time 115 (62.5%)
Not available on my EMR 64 (34.8%)
Don’t need them 54 (29.3%)
Too many to choose from 32 (17.4%)
Not required by payors 32 (17.4%)
Value is unproven 31 (16.8%)
Requires labs (CRP or ESR) 26 (14.1%)
Too difficult or complex 23 (12.5%)
Language/communication difficulties (elderly, Spanish-speaking, etc.) 20 (10.9%)
*

responses not required nor mutually exclusive, so row totals do not sum to 100%. Metric physicians provided responses listed in the top half of the table regarding the reasons that they measure quantitatively; non-metric physicians provided the responses listed in the bottom half of the table regarding the reasons that they do not measure quantitatively.