Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pflugers Arch. 2017 Sep 2;470(1):97–112. doi: 10.1007/s00424-017-2063-2

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Comparison of microelectrode responses fabricated from DLC:N, Au, and ITO. Each electrode had a radius of 20 µm and was insulated with S1813 photoresist. Surfaces were cleaned with air plasma before testing. A: Cyclic voltammograms for a 1 mM K3Fe(CN)6 solution in 0.1 M KCl, pH 3.0, scan rate 1 V/s. B: Sample responses depicting quantal exocytosis from individual bovine chromaffin cells stimulated with a high K+ solution. Differences in the size or time course of these sample amperometric spikes do not necessarily represent consistent differences among electrode materials.