Table 3.

Effect of disulfiram on other measures of the rGT at either the 30- or 120-min pre-treatment time for the optimal (n = 29, 120 min; n = 27, 30 min) and suboptimal (n = 10, 120 min; n = 12, 30 min) groups. Data presented are mean ± SEM

Variable	Group	Doses (mg/kg)
		Vehicle	10	25	50	75	100
30-min pre-treatment
Trials	Optimal**	106 ± 6.9	113 ± 6.7	115 ± 6.4	112 ± 5.7	115 ± 5.6	111 ± 5.7
	Suboptimal	75 ± 3.4	71 ± 3.6	73 ± 2.3	76 ± 3.4	77 ± 5.5	67 ± 4.5
% premature	Optimal**	11 ± 1.5	11 ± 1.6	11 ± 1.8	11 ± 1.6	10 ± 1.4	10 ± 1.6
	Suboptimal	16 ± 2.4	19 ± 2.1	17 ± 1.9	16 ± 2	17 ± 2.3	17 ± 3.6
Reward perseverative	Optimal	0.01 ± 0.004	0.001 ± 0.001	0.02 ± 0.01	0.005 ± 0.002	0.007 ± 0.002	0.013 ± 0.01
	Suboptimal	0.015 ± 0.01	0.04 ± 0.02	0.002 ± 0.001	0.02 ± .01	0.03 ± 0.02	0.03 ± 0.03
Punishment perseverative	Optimal	0.052 ± 0.01	0.047 ± 0.01	0.055 ± 0.01	0.048 ± 0.004	0.049 ± 0.01	0.05 ± 0.01
	Suboptimal	0.048 ± 0.01	0.042 ± 0.01	0.050 ± 0.01	0.049 ± 0.01	0.051 ± 0.01	0.048 ± 0.01
Choice latency	Optimal	1.13 ± 0.14	1.21 ± .19	1.26 ± 0.20	1.26 ± 0.20	1.27 ± 0.18	1.29 ± 0.19
	Suboptimal	1.0 ± 0.15	0.86 ± 0.12	1.09 ± 0.16	1.1 ± 0.14	1.06 ± 0.16	1.27 ± 0.20
Collect latency	Optimal	3.08 ± 1.22	1.44 ± 0.06	3.05 ± 1.60	1.46 ± 0.06	1.49 ± 0.08	1.95 ± 0.36
	Suboptimal	1.28 ± 0.07	1.26 ± 0.09	1.24 ± 0.08	1.24 ± 0.07	1.20 ± 0.06	2.89 ± 1.60
% omissions	Optimal	0.82 ± 0.36	1.15 ± 0.61	1.36 ± 0.55	1.58 ± 0.81	1.34 ± 0.54	1.12 ± 0.34
	Suboptimal	1.40 ± 0.98	3.6 ± 2.48	1.12 ± 0.63	0.73 ± 0.28	1.05 ± 0.35	2.81 ± 2.46
120-min pre-treatment
Trials	Optimal**	113 ± 7.88	115 ± 7.64	108 ± 5.25	112 ± 5.62	104 ± 4.31	107 ± 6.79
	Suboptimal	67 +± 6.37	71 ± 5.13	81 ± 9.23	77 ± 6.9	73 ± 5.7	75 ± 5.51
% premature	Optimal**	13 ± 1.6	12 ± 1.4	11 ± 1.2	11 ± 1.2	14 ± 1.4	14 ± 1.7
	Suboptimal	20 ± 3.8	17 ± 2.8	20 ± 2.4	18 ± 2.7	20 ± 2.9	16 ± 2.8
Reward perseverative	Optimal	0.45 ± 0.13	0.38 ± 0.11	0.45 ± 0.13	0.46 ± 0.15	0.64 ± 0.18	0.41 ± 0.11
	Suboptimal	0.02 ± 0.01	0.05 ± 0.02	0.03 ± 0.02	0.03 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.01	0.02 ± 0.01
Punishment perseverative	Optimal	0.056 ± 0.01	0.049 ± 0.01	0.049 ± 0.01	0.052 ± 0.004	0.052 ± 0.01	0.049 ± 0.005
	Suboptimal	0.051 ± 0.01	0.063 ± 0.01	0.053 ± 0.01	0.058 ± 0.01	0.050 ± 0.01	0.058 ± 0.01
Choice latency	Optimal	0.95 ± 0.12	0.92 ± 0.11	0.96 ± 0.12	0.99 ± 0.15	0.95 ± 0.12	1.01 ± 0.15
	Suboptimal	1.36 ± 0.16	1.33 ± 0.21	1.08 ± 0.12	1.04 ± 0.06	1.02 ± 0.12	1.26 ± 0.13
Collect latency	Optimal	1.74 ± 0.43	1.35 ± 0.05	1.38 ± 0.07	1.33 ± 0.05	1.32 ± 0.05	1.31 ± 0.05
	Suboptimal	1.37 ± 1.13	1.36 ± 0.13	1.34 ± 0.09	1.36 ± 0.10	1.34 ± 0.09	1.37 ± 0.11
% omissions	Optimal	1.55 ± 0.79	0.85 ± 0.33	0.89 ± 0.37	1.47 ± 0.91	0.77 ± 0.38	1.10 ± 0.58
	Suboptimal	1.14 ± 0.38	0.42 ± 0.22	0.78 ± 0.48	0.36 ± 0.19	1.32 ± 0.89	1.08 ± 0.57

^**A significant effect of group (p < 0.05)