Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Aug 11;24(1):104–112. doi: 10.1017/S1355617717000546

Table 2.

Model comparisons among alternative latent change score models of domain-specific cognitive performance and IADL functioning: Results from ACTIVE (N=2,802)

Cognitive
domain
Model
stage
Model description RMSEA CFI Log-
likelihood
Number of
free
parameters
Change in -
2LL (df)
Memory performance
1 No coupling 0.068 0.931 −29510.602 28 REF
2 Memory → change IADL 0.069 0.931 −29509.842 29 1.520 (1)
3 IADL → change Memory 0.068 0.932 −29502.117 29 16.970 (1)
4 Dual coupling 0.069 0.933 −29500.766 30 19.672 (2)
Reasoning performance
1 No coupling 0.128 0.835 −27824.813 28 REF
2 Reasoning → change IADL 0.129 0.834 −27824.74 29 0.146 (1)
3 IADL → change Reasoning 0.129 0.833 −27708.008 29 233.610 (1)
4 Dual coupling 0.131 0.832 −27708.008 30 233.610 (2)
Speed of processing performance
1 No coupling 0.104 0.791 −31149.078 28 REF
2 Speed → change IADL 0.105 0.79 −31149.069 29 0.018 (1)
3 IADL → change Speed 0.107 0.781 −31120.467 29 57.222 (1)
4 Dual coupling 0.109 0.78 −31120.025 30 58.106 (2)

RMSEA: root mean squared error of approximation. CFI: comparative fit index. Df: degrees of freedom.