Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec;6(6):715–725. doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.11.02

Table 3. Potential areas of improvement identified in studies. Themes for potential improvement areas are listed under “Major areas”. Elaboration on how each theme was represented in each study is listed under “Specific areas of improvement”.

Major areas Specific areas of improvement
Preoperative planning Inadequate laboratory tests and imaging prior to surgery (7,24,25,27)
Anaesthetic period Inconsistent anaesthetic/sedation protocol, medication and equipment used (7,13,20-23,26), delayed anaesthetic pre-evaluation and preparation (19,20)
Paperwork Incomplete (i.e., delay in obtaining patient consent) (13,20,23), excess paperwork (24), redundant paperwork (21,22,28)
Instrument trays Delay in preparation of instrument trays (13,19,20,27), inadequate availability of instruments (13,20,27), delay in instrument processing (20,27)
Surgeons Late arrival to OT (20,28), delayed pre-evaluation (21), supervision of trainees (15,16)
Steps in process Re-performing steps (15), step(s) with highest time variance (7,14,16-18,24,25), longest operation step (14,17,18), variable number/type/sequence of steps to complete a task (14,16,26), unnecessary steps (25)
Patient transport Delay in transfer of patient to OT (13,19,20), delay in transfer of patient out of theatre into post-operative ward (20,22)
OT scheduling Surgical case volume variation (21)
Staff Inconsistent intraoperative team members (e.g., surgeons, anaesthetists, nurses, and OT technicians) (7,20,25), insufficient staff (24), lack of pre-defined roles and responsibilities (25,26)
Training Inadequate understanding of surgical process, related to surgical preparation of instruments, trainee inexperience, and rotation of trainees (19,20,23,24)
Communications Inadequate communication between team members (15,20,21)
Patient factors Late arrival to preoperative holding area and check-in (20,21), health status/anatomical differences (17,18)

OT, operating theatres.