Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 8;26(12):978–986. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006433

Table 1.

Framework for data collection and analysis

Framework dimension Evidence
1 QI as board priority 17–22
2 Using data for improvement 18–20
3 Familiarity with current performance 17 18
4 Degree of staff involvement 25
5 Degree of public/patient/carer involvement 25
6 Clear, systematic approach (clear and well-specified priorities, manageable number) 17 18 20
7 Balance between clinical effectiveness, patient experience and safety 18 20
8 Dynamics (how board members challenge/ask questions of each other) 13

QI, quality improvement.