Table 3.
QI maturity
| Organisation | Type | Overall rating | Framework dimensions | |||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |||
| 1 | Benchmarking | High | H | H | H | H | H | H | H | H |
| 2 | Participating | High | M | M | H | H/M | H/M | H | H | H |
| 3 | Participating | Medium | M | L/M | M | L/M | M | M | M | L |
| 4 | Comparator | Low/Medium | M/H | L/M | L/M | L/M | L/M | L/M | L | M |
| 5 | Participating | Low | M | L | M | L | L | M | L | L |
| 6 | Benchmarking | Medium | M | M | L | M | M | M | M | M |
| 7 | Benchmarking | Low | L | L | M | M | H | L | L | L |
| 8 | Comparator | Medium | L | M | M | M/H | M/H | L | L | L |
| 9 | Participating | Medium | L | M | M | M/H | M/H | L | M | M |
| 10 | Participating | Medium/High | M/H | M | H | L/M | L | H | H | M |
| 11 | Comparator | High | H | M | H | H | H | M | H | H |
| 12 | Comparator | Low/Medium | L/M | L/M | L | M/L | M | L | L | M |
| 13 | Comparator | Medium | M | M | M | L | L | M | M | H |
| 14 | Comparator | High | H/M | M | H | M/H | H/M | M | H | H |
| 15 | Participating | High | M | M | H | M/L | L/M | H | H | H |
QI, quality improvement.