Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 24;17(12):2716. doi: 10.3390/s17122716

Table 2.

Comparison of sensor responses of 433.92 MHz SAW coated with SWCNTs and MWCNTs dispersed separately in ethanol and toluene. Adapted with permission from [97], copyright (2005) Elsevier.

Type of VOC SWCNTs Dispersed into Ethanol MWCNTs Dispersed into Ethanol
Sensitivity (f/f)/c (ppm/ppm) Sensitivity f/c (kHz/ppm) LOD (ppm) Absolute Sensitivity f/c/fw (Hz/ppm/kHz) Sensitivity (f/f)/c (ppm/ppm) Sensitivity f/c (kHz/ppm) LOD (ppm) Absolute Sensitivity f/c/fw (Hz/ppm/kHz)
Ethanol 15.88 6.89 1.3 34.45 4.13 1.79 5.0 8.95
Ethyl Acetate 7.67 3.32 2.7 16.6 2.09 0.90 10.0 4.50
Toluene 7.32 3.17 2.8 15.85 2.33 1.01 9.0 5.05
SWCNTs Dispersed into Toluene MWCNTs Dispersed into Toluene
Sensitivity (f/f)/c (ppm/ppm) Sensitivity f/c (kHz/ppm) LOD (ppm) Absolute Sensitivity f/c/fw (Hz/ppm/kHz) Sensitivity (f/f)/c (ppm/ppm) Sensitivity f/c (kHz/ppm) LOD (ppm) Absolute Sensitivity f/c/fw (Hz/ppm/kHz)
Ethanol 14.62 6.34 1.4 31.70 2.02 0.87 10.2 4.35
Ethyl Acetate 12.58 5.45 1.6 27.25 3.99 1.73 5.2 8.65
Toluene 17.22 7.47 1.2 37.35 4.67 2.02 4.4 10.10

Measurements were conducted at room temperature 20°C, relative humidity 15%, exposure time of 10 min, noise level 3 kHz at S/N of 3. (f/f) represent fractional frequency shift, ∆f frequency shift, c concentration of vapors, (fw) frequency shift due to coating of CNTs.