Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 21;21(1):171–180. doi: 10.1111/hex.12599

Table 2.

Relative importance scores of the DMD attributes in the treatment decision according to neurologists and nurses, and results of the multivariable analyses for work function (neurologist or nurse) while controlling for other variables

Attribute Neurologists Nurses Difference in RIS according to profession
Rank Relative importance score Mean (SD) Rank Relative importance score Mean (SD) b [95% CI] t(59) p
Effect on disability progression 1 9.41 (1.78) 3 9.17 (1.41) −1.14 [−2.43. 0.16] −1.76 .084
Safety 2 9.19 (0.83) 1 9.38 (0.98) −0.03 [−0.77. 0.72] −0.07 .943
Effect on quality of life 3 9.02 (0.90) 2 9.34 (0.74) 0.58 [−0.09. 1.26] 1.73 .089
Effect on relapse rate 4 8.98 (0.84) 4 8.81 (0.92) −0.03 [−0.77. 0.72] −1.61 .113
Effect on development of plaques in the brain 5 8.16 (1.23) 5 8.55 (1.66) 0.12 [−1.11. 1.34] 0.19 .851
Severity of side effects 6 8.14 (1.20) 6 8.00 (0.92) −0.48 [−1.37. 0.40] −1.10 .276
Effect on the severity of relapse 7 7.08 (2.11) 7 7.52 (1.56) 0.41 [−1.10. 1.91] 0.54 .590
Effect on current MS symptoms 8 6.45 (2.83) 9 5.13 (2.97) −0.40 [−2.74. 1.93] −0.35 .731
Effect on life expectancy 9 5.71 (3.19) 12 4.23 (3.07) −0.78 [−3.40. 1.84] −0.60 .554
Uncertainty about long‐term consequences 10 5.63 (1.98) 11 4.72 (2.20) −1.34 [−3.09. 0.41] −1.53 .131
Influence on lifestyle 11 4.94 (0.61) 8 5.14 (0.59) 0.21 [−0.28. 0.71] 0.86 .392
Type of side effects 12 4.65 (1.42) 10 4.79 (1.56) −0.09 [−1.27. 1.10] −0.14 .886
Duration of side effects 13 2.42 (1.07) 14 2.83 (1.72) 0.59 [−0.64. 1.82] 0.97 .338
Pace of effect 14 2.02 (1.90) 15 2.83 (2.15) 0.74 [−0.92. 2.41] 0.90 .374
Mode of administration 15 1.50 (1.60) 16 1.26 (1.22) −0.73 [−1.90. 0.43] −1.26 .213
Insurance coverage 16 1.37 (2.60) 18 1.04 (1.97) −0.28 [−2.17. 1.62] −0.29 .771
Total DMD costs 17 1.22 (1.80) 25 0.16 (0.26) −1.27 [−2.29. −0.25]a −2.50 .015
Interaction with other medication 18 1.10 (0.83) 13 2.97 (2.32) 2.09 [0.60. 3.59]a 2.81 .007
Required monitoring 19 0.78 (1.01) 19 0.92 (1.59) 0.79 [−0.24. 1.81] 1.54 .129
Mode of action of DMD 20 0.67 (1.44) 17 1.17 (1.82) 0.75 [−0.55. 2.05] 1.15 .254
Frequency of administration 21 0.66 (0.62) 20 0.85 (0.70) 0.19 [−0.36. 0.74] 0.70 .488
Duration of administration 22 0.35 (0.35) 24 0.17 (0.14) −0.05 [−0.25. 0.14] −0.55 .586
Further development of DMD 23 0.25 (0.64) 21 0.43 (0.65) 0.26 [−0.26. 0.78] 1.01 .316
Use of DMD among other MS patients 24 0.11 (0.10) 23 0.20 (0.17) 0.10 [−0.02. 0.21] 1.61 .114
Ease of travelling 25 0.10 (0.32) 26 0.09 (0.09) 0.05 [−0.14. 0.23] 0.53 .598
Composition of DMD 26 0.08 (0.14) 22 0.29 (0.51) 0.29 [−0.04. 0.61] 1.77 .082
Contact person at pharmaceutical company 27 0.01 (0.03) 27 0.02 (0.04) −0.01 [−0.03. 0.02] −0.48 .634

CI, confidence interval; DMD, disease‐modifying drug; MS, multiple sclerosis; RIS, relative importance score; SD, standard deviation.

a

P<.05.