Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 2;51(3 Suppl 1):S90–S101. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.52884

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies included in this systematic review.

Author Type of malocclusion Number of participants Age (years) Type of Anchorage used in the control group Mini-implant location
Males Females Total
Al-Sibaie et al.(22) Class II Division 1, overjet greater than 5mm 21 35 56 22.34 ± 4.56 TPA Interdental between U6 and U5 buccally
Benson et al.(23) Class II malocclusion with absolute anchorage. NR NR 51 12-39 (Range) HG Mid-palatal mini-implant
Feldmann et al.(24) Cases requiring 2 or 4 bicuspid extractions 60 60 120 14.3 ± 1.73 HG and TPA Palatal mini-implant and onplant
Liu et al.(25) Class I bimaxillary protrusion/ Class II Division 1 6 28 34 18-33 (range) TPA Interdental between U6 and U5 buccally
Ma et al.(26) Class I bimaxillary protrusion 14 16 30 18-22 (Range) HG and 2nd molars included Interdental between U6 and U5 buccally
Upadhyay et al.(27) Class I bimaxillary protrusion 0 36 36 17.5 ± 3.2 TPA, HG, Bonding 7s, Differential moments Interdental between U6 and U5 buccally