Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 2;51(3 Suppl 1):S90–S101. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.52884

Table 6.

Results of the quality assessment of included articles (a: low risk of bias, b: uncertain risk of bias, b: high risk of bias).

Quality assessment criteria Al-Sibaie et al.(22) Benson et al.(23) Feldmann et al.(24) Liu et al.(25) Ma et al.(26) Upadhyay et al.(27)
Random sequence generation (selection bias) +a +a +a +a +a +a
Allocation concealment (Selection bias) +a +a ?b ?b ?b ?b
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) +a +a -c ?b +a ?b
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) +a +a +a +a +a +a
Selective reporting (reporting bias) +a +a ?b ?b -c ?b
Other bias +a +a -c +a +a +a