Table 1.
Precision comparison between CoMet and other contig coverage and/or composition based binning methods
| Dataset | Metawatt | MaxBin | MyCC (default) | MyCC (coverage) | CoMet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sim10_1 | 96.69 (4) | 92.44 (5) | 97.47 (2) | 97.42 (3) | 97.94 (1) |
| sim10_20x | 84.25 (5) | 96.90 (2) | 90.66 (4) | 96.71 (3) | 98.66 (1) |
| sim10_80x | 95.13 (5) | 95.63 (4) | 98.55 (2) | 98.63 (1) | 97.12 (3) |
| sim30_CAMI | 53.68 (5) | 66.60 (4) | 75.02 (2) | 75.02 (2) | 92.93 (1) |
Binning methods are ranked based on their precision with different datasets with their ranks given in parentheses. Bold values indicate the highest of the precisions