TABLE 5.
3 Months | 6 Months | 9 Months | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CL | OR | 95% CL | OR | 95% CL | ||||
PDC ≥ 0.80 to index NOAC | |||||||||
Dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.87 |
Dabigatran vs. apixaban | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 0.83 | 0.70 | 0.57 | 0.87 |
Apixaban vs. rivaroxaban | 0.82 | 0.67 | 1.01 | 0.88 | 0.69 | 1.12 | 1.03 | 0.69 | 1.53 |
Age 65-74 vs. age < 65 | 1.78 | 1.52 | 2.09 | 1.51 | 1.28 | 1.78 | 1.52 | 1.23 | 1.89 |
Age ≥ 75 vs. age < 65 | 1.76 | 1.51 | 2.05 | 1.84 | 1.56 | 2.17 | 1.81 | 1.46 | 2.26 |
Hypertension | 1.19 | 1.05 | 1.36 | 1.20 | 1.05 | 1.38 | 1.31 | 1.09 | 1.57 |
Diabetes | 1.32 | 1.08 | 1.62 | 1.53 | 1.24 | 1.90 | 1.46 | 1.11 | 1.92 |
PDC ≥0.80 to all OAC | |||||||||
Dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.70 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.70 | 1.03 |
Dabigatran vs. apixaban | 0.88 | 0.82 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 1.03 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 1.15 |
Apixaban vs. rivaroxaban | 0.85 | 0.69 | 1.06 | 0.87 | 0.68 | 1.11 | 0.90 | 0.61 | 1.35 |
Age 65-74 vs. age < 65 | 1.98 | 1.68 | 2.34 | 1.68 | 1.41 | 1.99 | 1.65 | 1.33 | 2.05 |
Age ≥ 75 vs. age < 65 | 1.92 | 1.63 | 2.26 | 1.92 | 1.62 | 2.27 | 1.93 | 1.55 | 2.40 |
Hypertension | 1.20 | 1.05 | 1.38 | 1.18 | 1.03 | 1.37 | 1.32 | 1.10 | 1.59 |
Diabetes | 1.31 | 1.06 | 1.62 | 1.48 | 1.18 | 1.85 | 1.32 | 1.00 | 1.75 |
Note: Other variables included in the model with nonsignificant effects: gender, urbal/rural status, region, Charlson comorbidity score, history of stroke, vascular disease, renal disease, liver disease, prior bleeding or medications that increase risk of bleeding, alcohol abuse, hyperlipidemia, cancer ± metastases, and dementia. Bold results are significant at P < 0.05.
CL = confidence limit; NOAC = non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; OAC = oral anticoagulant; OR = odds ratio; PDC = proportion of days covered.