Fig. 5.

Sensitivity comparisons across different methods.

a) Box-plot of sensitivity in the training set across different methods with false positive rate set as 5 events/min. Post-hoc paired t-test showed the best one (L-c25) of our learning methods is significantly better than the best one (C-r500) of template based methods (p = 5.41e-20). b) Box-plot of sensitivity in the testing set across different methods with false positive rate set as 5 events/min. Post-hoc paired t-test showed the best one (L-c25) of our learning methods is significantly better than the best one (C-r500) of template based methods (p = 1.39e-14). C-rN represents correlation template-based methods with template size along time dimension as N ms; L-cN represents our learning-based methods with N as the number of reorder combinations.