Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Oct 30;154(2):319–328. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3626-6

Table 3.

Intervention effects on clinical outcomes at 11-year (median) follow-up multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions and Weibull accelerated failure time model: invasive tumor subsample only (N = 197)

Variable Breast cancer-specific mortalitya
Breast cancer recurrenceb
HR (95 % CI) p HR (95 % CI) p
Study condition (CBSM) 0.08 (0.01–0.49) .006 0.24 (0.07–0.82) .011
Age at diagnosis 0.88 (0.79–0.97) .010 0.94 (0.88–1.00) .024
Her2/neu (positive) 4.33 (0.81–23.21) .087 2.92 (0.97–8.77) .039
Tumor size
 >T2 7.47 (0.64–87.57) .109 4.61 (0.82–25.82) .062
 T1c 3.61 (0.29–45.71) .321 2.89 (0.67–22.18) .111
 <T1c .266
Endocrine therapy (yes) 0.28 (0.06–1.24) .093 0.49 (0.17–1.43) .174
Stage (III vs. I and II) 23.46 (3.65–150.62) .001 4.03 (1.05–15.46) .026

HR hazard ratio, 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval, HER2/neu human epidermal growth receptor, CBSM cognitive-behavioral stress management

a

Analyzed with Cox proportional hazards models

b

Analyzed with Weibull accelerated failure time models