Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 29;9(1):1–18. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0310-z

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies

Author (year), larger project if applicable Country of study (country of participants) Study design Number of participants Customer type/price paid FU duration Demographic characteristics of the study population Post-test contact The same study population as Notes
Bloss et al. (2011b), SGHI USA Longitudinal observational study 2037 Not real/reduced RRP 3 months 55.3% female
Mean age (range) = 47 (19–85)
84.2% White
Median education level category: some postgraduate education
Median income category = $100,000–$149,000
Online report
Pro-active genetic counselling outreach by Navigenics; initially only for specific subgroups, later all customers
Bloss et al. (2013), Boeldt et al. (2015), Darst (2013) and Darst et al. (2013) Participants were employees from health and technology companies who were offered the regular Navigenics Health Compassa at a reduced rate
Bloss et al. (2013), SGHI USA Longitudinal observational study 1325 Not real/reduced RRP 1 year 60.2% female
Mean age (range) = 48 (19–84)
84.9% Caucasian
Median education category: some post-college education
Median income category = $100,000–$149,000
See Bloss et al. (2011b) Bloss et al. (2011b), Boeldt et al. (2015) and Darst et al. (2013)
Boeldt et al. (2015), SGHI USA Longitudinal observational study 2037 Not real/reduced RRP 3 months 55% female
Mean age (range) = 47 (19–85)
84% Caucasian
Median education category: some post-college education
Median income category = $100,000–$149,000
See Bloss et al. (2011b) Bloss et al. (2011b, 2013)) and Darst et al. (2013)
Carere et al. (2016), Pgen study USA Longitudinal observational study 998 Real/full RRP 6 months 59.9% female
Mean age (range) = 47 (19–94)
85.8% White
Predominant education category: Some graduate school (36.0%)
Predominant income category = <100,000 (56.0%)
Standard procedures of genetic testing companies van der Wouden et al. (2016)and Olfson et al. (2016) New customers of 23andMea and Pathway genomicsa
Darst et al. (2013), SGHI USA Longitudinal observational study 1325 Not real/reduced RRP 14 months 55.6% female
Mean age (range) = 51 (23–75)
85.6% Caucasian
Modal education category: master’s degree (25%)
Median income category = $150,000–$199,999 (15%)
See Bloss et al. (2011a, b) Bloss et al. (2011a, 2013), Boeldt et al. (2015)and Darst et al. (2014)
Darst et al. (2014), SGHI USA Longitudinal observational study 2024 Not real/reduced RRP 6 months Sharers:
57% female
Mean age (range) = 50 (20–85)
84.6% Caucasian
Median education category: some post-college
Median income category = $150,000–$199,999
Non-sharers:
54.6% female
Mean age (range) = 45 (19–81)
84.0% Caucasian
Median education category: some post-college
Median income category = $100,000–$149,999
See Bloss et al. (2011a) Bloss et al. (2011b,, 2013), Boeldt et al. (2015)and Darst et al. (2013)
Egglestone et al. (2013) USA (71.8%), UK (9.4%), Canada (6.6%), Australia (3.9%), other (8.3%) Cross-sectional study 189 Real/full RRP Different per participant (no range reported) 37% female
Predominant age category = 30–44 (58%)
84.2% Caucasian
Predominant education category: postgraduate degree (55.3%)
Standard procedures of genetic testing companies None Data included in our study is restricted to actual consumers (excluding potential consumers, as reported)
Participants included customers of 9 different DTC-GT companiesa
Gordon et al. (2012), CPMC USA Qualitative cross-sectional study 60 Not real/free At least 3 months 60% female
Average age = 48.9
68% Caucasian
Predominant education category: college degree or more (60%)
Online report, with additional educational material offered online and in educational sessions None Data included in our study is the quantitative data reported by the authors
The genetic testing is offered through the study for coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes, haemochromatosis, prostate cancer, melanoma, age-related macular degeneration, and lupus. Other non-genetic factors are included to calculate risk estimates
Haga et al. (2014) USA Randomised intervention study 300 Not real/free 1 week 27% female
Predominant age category = 18–29 (44%)
68% White
Predominant education category: bachelor’s degree or higher (72%)
Online only or printed and communicated in person, depending on randomised condition None Non-diabetic participants from the general public were randomized to receive their type 2 diabetes mellitus genetic testing results in person from a certified genetic counsellor or access them online through a secure website. Testing was done through deCODEa
James et al. (2011) USA Randomised intervention study 150 Not real/free 1 week and 1 year 28% female
Predominant age category = 60–69 (47%)
Predominant education category: graduate or professional school (47%)
Online report prior to planned appointment with physician. Genetic counselling from Navigenics had been offered, but none of the participants had requested this None Participants were recruited from a prevention clinic and received a free modified version of standard test of Navigenicsa, including only “actionable” diseases (abdominal aneurysm, atrial fibrillation, breast cancer (women only), celiac disease, colon cancer, type 2 diabetes mellitus, Graves’ disease, myocardial infarction, lung cancer, obesity, osteoarthritis and prostate cancer (men only)). The intervention group received the genetic testing in addition to their usual care preventive medicine appointment. They were granted access to the result 1 week before their scheduled preventive medicine appointment. The control group received usual care only, including a wide range of examinations based on medical and family history, physiological examinations and screening tests
Kaphingst et al. (2012), MI USA Longitudinal observational study 199 Not real/free 3 months 57% female
Mean age (SD) = 35 (4.2)
62% White
Predominant education category: college degree or higher (52%)
Mailed report. Participants were contacted within 10 days by a research educator who further explained results, and participants could ask questions Reid (2012) and O’Neill (2015) Participants, selected from a large health maintenance organization, received free health screening for 8 common health conditions (diabetes, osteoporosis, heart disease, colon cancer, high cholesterol, lung cancer, high blood pressure and skin cancer)
Kaufman et al. (2012) USA Cross-sectional study 1046 Real/full RRP 2–7 months 46% female
Predominant age category = 55–74 (42%)
87% White
Predominant education category: postgraduate (54%)
Predominant income category = >$125,000 (45%)
Standard procedures of genetic testing companies None Includes participants from three genetic testing companies (Navigenicsa, 23andMea and deCODEmea), approached through email
Lee et al. (2013) NR Cross-sectional study 80 Real/full RRP Different per participant (no range reported) 50.0% female
Mean age (range) = 44 (23–72)
80.3% White
Predominant education category = 4-year college graduate (33.3%)
Predominant household income category = <$50.000 (31.6%)
Standard procedures of genetic testing companies None Online survey among 23andMea customers, administered following an in-depth interview. Information about the study was published in the blog that is emailed directly to 23andMe customers
McGrath et al. (2016) USA Cross-sectional study 122 Real/full RRP Not reported 32.8% female
Mean age (range) = 34 (19–71)
Predominant education category: master’s degree or higher (38.5%)
Median income = $90,000
Standard procedures of genetic testing companies None Online survey administered to 23andMea customers
McGuire et al. (2009) USA Cross-sectional study 63 Real/full RRP Different per participant (no range reported) 59% female
Predominant age category = 25–34 (38%)
77% Caucasian
Predominant education category: bachelor’s degree (36%)
Standard procedures of genetic testing companies None Survey administered to general population. Data included is only on participants who “did use” personal genetic testinga
Olfson et al. (2016), Pgen USA Longitudinal prospective cohort study 1464 Real/full RRP 6 months 61% female
Mean age (range) = 44 (23–72)
90% White
College degree or more advanced education = 78%
Mean household income category = $70,000–$99,999
Carere et al. (2016) Carere et al. (2016)and van der Wouden et al. (2016)
O’Neill et al. (2015), MI USA Longitudinal observational study 228 Not real/free 10 days 56.6% female
Mean age (SD) = 35 (4.2)
62.3% non-Hispanic White
Predominant education category: college or more (67.1%)
See Kaphingst et al. (2012) Kaphingst et al. (2012)and Reid et al. (2012)
Reid et al. (2012), MI USA Longitudinal observational study 1599 Not real/free Comparing health care use 12 months prior and post testing 59.0% female
Predominant age category = 35–40 (61.3%)
61.3% White
Predominant education category: college graduate (51.2%)
See Kaphingst et al. (2012) Kaphingst et al. (2012)and O’Neill et al. (2015)
van der Wouden et al. (2016), Pgen USA Longitudinal prospective cohort study 1026 Real/full RRP 6 months 39.7% female
Mean ages = 45–51
85.1% White
Predominant education category: some graduate school (35.5%)
Predominant income category = $100,000–$199,999 (30.3%)
See Carere et al. (2016) Carere et al. (2016)and Olfson et al. (2016)

CPMC Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative, FU follow-up, MI multiplex initiative, NR not reported, Pgen Impact of Personal Genomics study, RRP regular retail price, SGHI Scripps Genomic Health Initiative

aRefers to commercially available services