Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 3;5(1):ENEURO.0208-17.2017. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0208-17.2017

Table 1.

Time to shoal was found to be significantly longer in the mTBI versus control group

Sample Pre-injury 0 dpi 1 dpi 2 dpi 3 dpi p-value
Control 9.9 ± 3.949 13.405 ± 5.429* 11.223 ± 2.753* 8.535 ± 2.534 6.62 ± 3.37*
mTBI 9.9 ± 3.949 107.488 ± 63.267* 48.378 ± 29.949* 17.82 ± 11.197 15.97 ± 6.65*

Spatial memory testing was conducted 1 h after injury on the day of mTBI induction (day 0) as well as once per day for 3 d after the administration of mTBI and sham injuries. Average time to shoal measured in seconds for mTBI and control zebrafish found a statically significant difference between mTBI and sham controls, although no significant effect was found between days or among the interaction effect, p = 0.034, F(1,5) = 8.324. Tukey’s multiple comparison post hoc test confirmed that days 0, 1, and 3 dpi were significantly different between groups (A). n = 6 per group.

*Significant difference between mTBI and control groups on that specific day by Tukey multiple comparison post hoc analysis (p < 0.05).