Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 2;84(2):e02129-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02129-17

TABLE 4.

Studies on improvement of lipase thermostability

Lipase Design category Method(s) Improvement (°C) No. in screening library Reference
Bacterial
    Bacillus subtilis lipase A Irrational DNA shuffling 22.0 18,000 3
    Bacillus subtilis lipase LipJ Irrational Error-prone PCR 13.0 4,200 16
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipase Irrational Error-prone PCR 2.5 2,600 19
    Bacillus subtilis lipase A Semirational B-factor analysis 45.0 8,000 4
    Geobacillus zalihae T1 lipase Rational I-mutant 2.0 2 52
Fungal
    Candida antarctica lipase B Irrational DNA shuffling 6.4 2,500 17
    Rhizopus arrhizus lipase Irrational Error-prone PCR, DNA shuffling 10.0 5,500 18
    Yarrowia lipolytica lipase Lip2 Semirational B-factor analysis 3.0 4,200 21
    Candida antarctica lipase B Semirational B-factor analysis 12.0 2,200 22
    Candida rugosa lipase 1 Semirational B-factor analysis 12.7 20,000 23
    Candida antarctica lipase B Rational MODIP, DbD v1.20 8.5 5 38
    Candida antarctica lipase B Rational B-factor analysis, RosettaDesign 2.3 7 31
    Rhizomucor miehei lipase Rational DbD 3.0 1 37
    Rhizomucor miehei lipase Rational This study 14.3 38 This study