Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 15;9(12):5684–5695.

Table 2.

Factors predicting distant metastasis in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast

Characteristic Univariate Multivariate

Distant metastasis P-value P-value Relative risk (95% confidence interval)

Present (%) Absent (%)
Age (years) >50 6 (5.4) 105 (94.6) 0.067 Not applicable
≤50 14 (12.4) 99 (87.6)
Histological grade 1 2 (3.5) 55 (96.5) 0.092 Not applicable
2 9 (9.7) 84 (90.3)
3 9 (12.2) 65 (87.8)
Tumor size (cm) >2.0 12 (10.7) 100 (89.3) 0.349 Not applicable
≤2.0 8 (7.1) 104 (92.9)
Pathological T stage pT1 8 (7.1) 104 (92.9) 0.017* 0.699 1.218 (0.447-3.321)
pT2 7 (6.9) 94 (93.1)
pT3 5 (45.5) 6 (54.5)
Pathological N stage pN0 7 (5.8) 113 (94.2) 0.016* 0.085 2.383 (0.888-6.396)
pN1 5 (7.7) 60 (92.3)
pN2 5 (23.8) 16 (76.2)
pN3 3 (16.7) 15 (83.3)
Lymphovascular invasion Present 12 (13.5) 77 (86.5) 0.052 Not applicable
Absent 8 (5.9) 127 (94.1)
Extensive Intraductal component Present 1 (2.5) 39 (97.5) 0.138 Not applicable
Absent 19 (10.3) 165 (89.7)
Estrogen receptor status Negative 13 (8.1) 148 (91.9) 0.474 Not applicable
Positive 7 (11.1) 56 (88.9)
Progesterone receptor status Negative 9 (6.1) 139 (93.9) 0.037* 0.135 2.103 (0.794-5.573)
Positive 11 (14.5) 65 (85.5)
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status Negative 4 (6.8) 55 (93.2) 0.603 Not applicable
Positive 16 (9.7) 149 (90.3)
Triple negativity Yes 5 (16.7) 25 (83.3) 0.110 Not applicable
No 15 (7.7) 179 (92.3)
Sphingosine kinase 1 expression High 15 (17.6) 70 (83.3) < 0.001* 0.001* 5.841 (2.024-16.858)
Low 5 (3.6) 134 (96.4)
*

Statistically significant.