Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 21;2017:9707650. doi: 10.1155/2017/9707650

Table 5.

Description of the main studies in keratoconus (KC) management with hybrid contact lens (HCL) system.

Author Type of study Type of CL Sample size (eyes) Severity KC BCLCVA (logMAR) (mean) Follow-up (months) (mean) Mean age or age (years) Sex (female/male)
Ozkurt et al. [108] Retrospective case series SoftPerm CL 24 NR Better than +0.5 23 25.78 8/6
Nau [107] Retrospective SynergEyes HCLs versus RPGCLs 79 NR +0.2 3 36.17 32/21
Abdalla et al. [112] Retrospective SynergEyes HCLs 61 Moderate and severe 0.0 To +0.1 (31.1%)
+0.2 to +0.3 (62.3%)
7.8 40 18/26
Carracedo et al. [113] Prospective comparative ClearKone HCLs versus patient habitual CL 33 Moderate and severe −0.024 1 26.3 5/13
Hahemi et al. [106] Comparative case series ClearKone HCLs (group 1) versus RPGCLs (group 2) 40 Moderate Group 1 : 0.01
Group 2 : 0.02
2 Group 1: 33.71
Group 2: 32.16
21/19

BCLCVA: best contact lens corrected visual acuity; NR: not reported; OD: right eye; CL: contact lens. Mild KC (average sim K < 45 D). Moderate (average sim K 45–52 D). Severe (average sim K > 52 D).